The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.

Sunday, January 3, 2021

The Ruler Isn't Omnipotent


For John, BLUF:  I find it interesting that President Trump would sign a declaration honoring Saint Thomas à Becket.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Daily Signal (the Heritage Foundation), Ms Mary Margaret Olohan, 29 December 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

President Donald Trump declared Dec. 29 the anniversary of the Roman Catholic martyr St. Thomas Becket, honoring the 12th-century English bishop as “a lion of religious liberty.”

“Thomas Becket’s death serves as a powerful and timeless reminder to every American that our freedom from religious persecution is not a mere luxury or accident of history, but rather an essential element of our liberty,” the president’s proclamation said.  “It is our priceless treasure and inheritance. And it was bought with the blood of martyrs.”

The president highlighted Archbishop Becket’s martyrdom in a proclamation issued Monday, describing how knights of King Henry II of England murdered the Catholic saint in his own church after he refused to acknowledge the king as his supreme ruler.

“His last words on this earth were these,” the proclamation said, “‘For the name of Jesus and the protection of the Church, I am ready to embrace death.’  Dressed in holy robes, Thomas was cut down where he stood inside the walls of his own church.”

That President Trump would honor this Saint suggests that he does have some inkling about the separation of powers within our Federal Government and the idea that the Tenth Amendment exists.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, January 2, 2021

Worst Year Ever?


For John, BLUF:  Yes, 2020 has been disruptiuve, but for most of us, who have lived a while, it is not the worse we have every experienced or heard of.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Babylon Bee, 2 December 2020.

Here is the lede plus two:

U.S.—Across the country, there is general consensus that 2020 has been the "worst year ever."  According to studies, 82% of Americans agree that 2020 has been a terrible year of unprecedented suffering and misery.  Experts confirmed that 2020 was indeed the worst year, provided you have never lived in virtually any other time period in all of human history.

"We noticed that most of the respondents who called 2020 the worst year also enjoyed delicious food being delivered to them for 8 months while they sat on their couches with the air conditioning on and binge-watched shows the whole time," said one researcher.

"While we understand it hasn't been easy, we also found very few instances of Viking raids, Black Plague, famine, world war, using rotary telephones, needing to look things up in a physical dictionary, slavery, people being burned at the stake, walking miles to school, living in caves, sleeping on the ground, ice ages, Nazi holocausts, civil war, infant mortality, global floods, ethnic cleansing, using leaves as toilet paper, using leeches as medicine, using wooden mallets as an anesthetic, fighting wild saber-tooth tigers, cannibalism, occupation by the Persian Empire... what was I talking about again?  Oh yeah-- most people in 2020 never experienced any of those things, so comparatively speaking it's been a pretty decent year!"

The worst was rotary phones.

The question is, will 2021 be worse?  The vaccine promises nrelief from COVID-19, but there are other issues out there carrying over from 2020.

Regards  —  Cliff

Congress Is Coming Back


For John, BLUF:  Here is the scheedule for the House of Representatives for this next week, starting on Sunday.  Note that Sunday, at 10:00, is a meeting of the 116th Session of Congress, the Congress going out.  At Noon the new Congress, the 117th Session meetings and begins work.  On Wednesday they get down to counting the votes of the Electoral College.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




WEEK OF JANUARY 4TH

SUNDAY, JANUARY 3RD

On Sunday, the 116th Congress will meet at 10:00 a.m. for legislative business and adjourn sine die.

The House will convene for the start of the 117th Congress at 12:00 p.m. Members are advised that there will be a recorded quorum call at 12:00 p.m. following the Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance.

Election of the Speaker of the House

Swearing-in of Members and Delegates

MONDAY, JANUARY 4TH On Monday, the House will meet at 10:00 a.m. for legislative business.

H.Res. 5 - Adopting the Rules of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress, and for other purposes (Sponsored by Rep. Steny Hoyer / Rules Committee)

TUESDAY, JANUARY 5TH
On Tuesday, the House will meet at 12:00 p.m. for legislative business.

Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules:

1) H.R. __ – FedRAMP Authorization Act (Sponsored by Rep. Gerry Connolly / Oversight and Reform Committee)

2) H.R. __ – Congressional Budget Justification Transparency Act of 2021 (Sponsored by Rep. Mike Quigley / Oversight and Reform Committee)

3) H.R. __ – Inspector General Protection Act (Sponsored by Rep. Ted Lieu / Oversight and Reform Committee)

4) H.R. __ – Construction Consensus Procurement Improvement Act of 2021 (Sponsored by Rep. James Comer / Oversight and Reform Committee)

5) H.R. __ – Settlement Agreement Information Database Act of 2021 (Sponsored by Rep. Gary Palmer / Oversight and Reform Committee)

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6TH AND THE BALANCE OF THE WEEK
On Wednesday, the House will meet at 12:00 p.m. for legislative business.

At 1:00 p.m., the House will convene for the Joint Session of Congress to count the electoral ballots for the President and Vice-President of the United States.

Members are advised that votes are possible during the Joint Session. Additional information regarding votes will be announced as soon as it becomes available.

Additional Legislative Items Are Possible

Regards  —  Cliff

A Good Examination of Voting Issues


For John, BLUF:  Sure, Joe Biden will be finally confirmed as President Elect on 6 January, when the Electoral College vote is counted by Congress, per the Constitution.  The process is an opportunity to review our election rules and perhaps bring attention to needed improvements.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From American Greatness, by Ms Debra Heine, 29 December 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

A researcher at the Department of Justice on Tuesday released a 25-page report♠ indicating a high probability of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.  World-renown economist John Lott Ph.D., examined election results from Pennsylvania and Georgia, as well as potential election fraud in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin.

“This paper’s approach allows us to quantify how large a potential problem vote fraud and other abnormalities might be in the 2020 election,” Dr. Lott wrote.

The paper provides us a review of absentee voting in other Democracies.  I found that part very interesting.  Other nations are much more restrictive with absentee voting than the various States of the United Statess.

We are, in this paper, dealing with statistical extractations and suspicions.  In the first example the author is looking at Fulton County, Georgia.  The author compares 2016 and 2020 votes in Fulton and surrounding Counties and finds a 7.19% difference.

The fact that the shift happens only in absentee ballots, and when a country line is crossed, is suspicious.
This is not smoking gun proof, unless one is a statistician.  That said, it raises questions that have not been properly ventilated in the media.  Thus, a challenge in the Joint Session of Congress on 6 January would not be out of order as a way of calling attention to questionable election practices.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  The post had a link that one would think went to the report, but SSRN give a 404 Error.  I wonder what that is all about?  I fixed it.

Friday, January 1, 2021

Challenges to the Electoral College Vote


For John, BLUF:  The Electoral College process is unfamiliar to most of us and here is an article that explains it.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Boston Globe, by Associated Press Writer Mary Clare Jalonick, 30 December 30, 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

The congressional joint session to count electoral votes is generally a routine, ceremonious affair.  But President Donald Trump’s repeated, baseless efforts to challenge Democrat Joe Biden’s victory will bring more attention than usual to next Wednesday’s joint session of the Senate and the House.

The congressional count is the final step in reaffirming Biden’s win, after the Electoral College officially elected him on Dec 14.  The meeting is required by the Constitution and includes several distinct steps.

Republicans who are echoing Trump's baseless claims of fraud have said they will officially object to the results, forcing votes in the Republican-run Senate and the Democratic-controlled House that will almost certainly fail.  A group of House Republicans had been looking for a senator to sign on because there must be support from at least one member of each chamber to force the votes.  That support came Wednesday from Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, a possible contender in the 2024 GOP presidential primary.

Did Ms Jalonick just use the phrase "baseless claims" twice in three paragraphs.  It sounds like she is selling something.  Selling something I am not buying.  Yes, I expect former VEEP Joe Biden to be sworn in as the next President of this Republic.  That does not mean that there is not a foul stench eminating from several locations where votes were counted.  On top of that, voting machines with proprietary software is just unconsionable.

Hat tip to Ann Althouse for also addressing this process and for talking about Democratic Party Congresscritters running their own objections to Electors over a number of recent elections where Republican candidates won.  Yesterday she had a Blog Post on this, "Mr. Hawley’s challenge is not unprecedented... Democrats in both the House and Senate challenged certification of the 2004 election results...".  Quoting from the NYT:

"... and House Democrats tried on their own to challenge the 2016 and 2000 outcomes, though without Senate support.  ... Senator Barbara Boxer of California... briefly delayed the certification of George W. Bush’s victory... cit[ing] claims that Ohio election officials had improperly purged voter rolls... which Mr. Bush carried by fewer than 120,000 votes.  Nancy Pelosi, then the House Democratic leader, supported the challenge....  The House voted 267 to 31 against the challenge and the Senate rejected it 74 to 1...  After the 2016 election, several House Democrats tried again, rising during the joint session to register challenges against Mr. Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton in various states.  The Democrats cited reasons ranging from long lines at polling sites to the Kremlin’s election influence operation."
Her punch line:
So... in the last three decades, every time a Republican won, Congressional Democrats challenged the certification of the election, and every time a Democrat won, Congressional Republicans did not challenge the certification.

That certainly puts a different light on what Josh Hawley is doing!

Indeed it does.

Regards  —  Cliff

All The Cooking Fit For Wokism


For John, BLUF:  Political Correctness ruined a popular cooking show from Bon Appetit  Who benefitted?  Not the many people who viewed the show and learned about cooking while being entertained.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

The Bon Appetit saga proved you can politicize everything, as the mob demands, or you can create a vibrant, innovative culture — but you can't have both.

From The Federalist, by Sommelier Ellie Bufkin, 10 December 2020.

Here is the lede plus five:

During the lockdown regime of the past year, millions of Americans turned to their televisions, computers, and phone screens to escape despair.  Because we are creatures of innovation and curiosity, however, many people taught themselves to make sourdough bread starters from the internet and something new the next day.

The bread-baking game got so out of hand at one point this summer that yeast vanished from grocery store shelves.  The appetite for hobbies, knowledge, and bread was ferocious.

Suddenly barred from dining out, the gastronomically inclined turned to their own kitchens, ordered new tools from the internet, and taught themselves culinary tricks.  Social media overflowed with images of the burgeoning class of new home chefs, spurned from their favorite table at Le Diplomate but finally finding joy in sipping Gamay at home while searing their first-ever magret de canard.

It takes a nearly perfect combination of skill, approachability, and charisma to hook an audience the way Julia Child did, but one cooking channel stood above the rest, garnering millions of loyal followers even before the pandemic.  Bon Appetit’s “Test Kitchen” series on YouTube seemed to truly understand people’s modern need for a combination of real instruction with a willingness to fail.

Even in the vast sea of online cooking shows, this one stood out.  Imagine the natural give and take of NBC’s enormously popular sitcom “Friends” in a cooking show.  That was the vibe from the bright and engaging stars of the “Test Kitchen.”

Even with all its charisma and promise, however, Bon Appetit couldn’t stave off the death grip of leftist ideology.  It became one more source of entertainment and inspiration relegated to the burning cultural heap just when Americans most needed a pandemic and political escape.

Many of us learn from our mistakes.  That is not good enough for our woke masters.  For them it is one strike and you are out.  There is no redemption.  It is an attitude that reminds me more of the Chinese Communist Party than of America.  Freedom means the right to be wrong.  It is not a license to do wrong, but it is the space to grow and correct one's mistakes.

Bad behavior is not to be encouraged.  Rather, it is to be discouraged.  Having an alternative view is one thing, and being a bore, or being insulting to other people is another.  There may be a fine line in some cases.  We must leave space for alternative views, although not necessarily in our own parlor or our local drinking establishment.  Alternative views help us advance.  Much of what we knew to be true 121 years ago has now been proven false.  And it is a better world for it.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Happy New Year


For John, BLUF:  It was a rough year, but 2020 is in the rear view mirror.  Nothing to see here; just move along.



It is our job to make 2021 better for all.

But not force anyone.

Regards  —  Cliff