Subsidizing the markers of status doesn’t produce the character traits that result in that status; it undermines them.This comes from a year and a half old post at The View from Alexandria. The larger quote from Professor Reynolds was:
The government decides to try to increase the middle class by subsidizing things that middle class people have: If middle-class people go to college and own homes, then surely if more people go to college and own homes, we’ll have more middle-class people. But homeownership and college aren’t causes of middle-class status, they’re markers for possessing the kinds of traits — self-discipline, the ability to defer gratification, etc. — that let you enter, and stay, in the middle class. Subsidizing the markers doesn’t produce the traits; if anything, it undermines them.Food for thought. Which end of the telescope are we using to view this issue?
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.