ruled that circumcision of children for religious reasons at the instruction of parents constituted the infliction of bodily harm and therefore was a punishable offense.As the blog poster noted:
Of course, for observant Jews, circumcision of male children is not optional. It is required as a matter of Jewish law. To prohibit it is, in effect, to forbid Jews from being Jews.Are we heading back to 1920?
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.