For John, BLUF: Special Council Robert Mueller (Russia Gate) is not a choirboy. Nothing to see here; just move along.
This essay is from Attorney Harvey Silverglate, on 17 October 2017, at Boston Public Radio station WGBH (89.7 FM).
The first three paragraphs don't leave me with a good feeling about Special Council Robert Mueller:
Is special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, appointed in mid-May to lead the investigation into suspected ties between Donald Trump’s campaign and various shady (aren’t they all?) Russian officials, the choirboy that he’s being touted to be, or is he more akin to a modern-day Tomas de Torquemada, the Castilian Dominican friar who was the first Grand Inquisitor in the 15th Century Spanish Inquisition?Especially the Friar Tomas de Torquemada part.Given the rampant media partisanship since the election, one would think that Mueller’s appointment would lend credibility to the hunt for violations of law by candidate, now President Trump and his minions.
But I have known Mueller during key moments of his career as a federal prosecutor. My experience has taught me to approach whatever he does in the Trump investigation with a requisite degree of skepticism or, at the very least, extreme caution.
Further down in the essay Mr Silverglate points out to us that Federal laws are so loose and so plenteous that just about anyone can be found to have violated one or another of them.
My impression, after reading the item, is that Mr Mueller will come up with someone to indict, no matter how long it takes to do it. It may have nothing to do with the allegations of the Trump Campaign colluding with the Russians, but it will be something.
My question is, will there be any examination of the other side to see if they colluded with the Russians?
How silly of me.
My supplemental question is the one asked by former Labor Secretary Raymond J Donovan: "Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?"
I would like to see Attorney General Jeff Sessions answer that question by publicly acknowledging the innocence of those who are smeared by the accusations of wrong-doing and are found to not be guilty of the crime or crimes of which they were accused, by indictment, innuendo or leak.
ADDED THOUGHT: When Public Radio is turning against you it should be a sign that you are losing the PR Battle.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.