For John, BLUF: I wonder if those calling for the Impeachment of President Trump, or at least his post-presidency indictment, have thought about how that will slowly spin out of control, if not immediately, at least after the American People grow tired of Beto O'Rourke and all he will bring to the White House, and vote the Republicans back in. Nothing to see here; just move along.
This headline is from The Hill, from an article by Reporter Michael Burke, 9 December 2018.
Then this Tweet emerged:
Joel B. PollakActually, this whole thing is interesting (e.g., the knife cuts both ways). The question becomes would I be willing to see former President Trump indicted on organizing hush money for Stormy Daneils if it meant that I could see Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz indicted for funding the Steele Dossier, and then not reporting it, in violation of campaign finance laws? Would the indictment of DWS then draw in former Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton? Would it reach forward to capture current Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez?
@joelpollak
Missing in today’s news: any acknowledgement that @HillaryClinton & the @DNC broke campaign finance law by failing to report they paid Fusion GPS via an intermediary for oppo research that triggered an FBI investigation. You don’t see @RepAdamSchiff calling for their prosecution!
11:49 AM · Dec 9, 2018 from Santa Monica, CA · Twitter for iPhone
It is possible that a round of indictments might, at least temporarily, change the culture in DC.\?
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.