For John, BLUF: it tuns out "Peer Reviewed" scientific studies are often dubious. Nothing to see here; just move along.
From The New York Post, by Professor Glenn H. Reynolds, 26 August 2021, 8:54pm.
No, this isn't about the COVID-19, although the moving goalposts for immunity should be a big signal, as should public school mask mandates (at best a 10% protection).
No, this is about "scientific" studies, peer reviewed, influencing government programs, that are later found to be dubious.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.