For John, BLUF: The Department of Justice is working hard to convict Presidential Candidate Donsald J Trump of somesthing. Maybe too hard. Nothing to see here; just move along.
Here is the sub-headline:
The conduct claimed is perhaps unprecedented and certainly flagrant. If proven true, the judge would be well within her rights to consider dismissal.
From The Federalist, by Former Federal Prosecutor Will Scharf, 5 July 2023.
Here is the lede plus two:
Lost in the breathless headlines over the indictment of President Trump for alleged violations of the Espionage Act is a story that deserves much more attention than it has received thus far: the allegation that a senior official at the Department of Justice attempted to shake down Trump’s co-defendant’s lawyer.  It is a scandal in the making that could result in the investigation of senior DOJ officials, which should lead to public congressional hearings, and that might even result in the entire case against Trump being dismissed.Presidential Candidate Donald J Trump has a lot of flaws. I am reading about some of them in Commander in Cheat, a 2020 book mailed to me by my buddy, Juan. However, it is up to the Voters to decide if Mr Trump's flaws are greater than those of his opponent. In 2016 they said no. In 2020 they said yes.Trump’s co-defendant is Waltine “Walt” Nauta, a Navy valet who served in Trump’s White House and who remained a personal aide to Trump after he left office.  Several weeks ago, Nauta’s lawyer, a distinguished, highly-regarded Washington attorney named Stanley Woodward, leveled accusations against senior members of the Department of Justice, including DOJ Counterintelligence Chief Jay Bratt, who is now a part of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team of prosecutors.  According to news reports, Woodward claimed in a sealed letter to D.C. District Chief Judge James Boasberg that, in a meeting to discuss Nauta’s case, Bratt indicated that Woodward’s application to be a D.C. Superior Court judge could be impacted if he could not get Nauta to testify against Trump.
If true, and I see no reason why Woodward would make such a threat up — and especially no reason why Woodward would risk his career by making such a representation to a federal judge — Bratt’s alleged misconduct could result in heavy sanctions, and is a potential ground for dismissal of the entire case against Nauta and Trump.  Depending on what exactly was said, Bratt could even face criminal prosecution himself.
Comparing candidates is the job of the Voters It is not the job of the US Department of Justice. We went through that with Saint James Comey, who took it upon himself to save the nation and the world. We, the Voters, do not need that kind of help. If Mr Trump broke some law, fine, go after him. However, let us have no DOJ intervention to "save" the nation (or President Joe Biden).
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be forthright, but please consider that this is not a barracks.