The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.
Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts

Sunday, September 14, 2025

City Life Show on Short Hiatus


For John, BLUF:  The Producer of City Life Show, and its leadin, The Dawn Patrol, is on a one week break, but the discussion goes on.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Je Suis Charlie Isn't Just a Slogan Anymore

From The Conservative Historian, by Blogger JIM MCCOY, 13 September 2025.

Here is the lede:

Once upon a time, I sat in a classroom at Wayne State University and, having listened to a faculty member scream offended and threaten to have me expelled because I wouldn’t kiss her ass, told her that the only way to silence me would be to kill me. I meant it then. I mean it now. If standing up for what I believe in costs me my life then know that I am content to have died in service to a good cause and that, given the chance, I’d do it again.
But, not everyone is sensitive to the events of last week.

  1. First we had the horrid murder of Ukrainian Refugee Iryna Zarutska, on August 22, 2025, on the Lynx Blue Line in Charlotte, North Carolina, by a mentally unstable career criminal.
  2. Then, the next day, we had the assassination of Turning Poit USA Head, Charlie Kirk, by , it ppears, Mr Tyler Robinson, who was arrested peacefully.
  3. Then we had the outpouring of vile comments following the Assassination, from Office Depot, to social media, to classrooms and the media.
  • Mr Robert Sterling on X wrote a long piece on this last ooint, which started:.

    My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue. I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues. Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious. And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left. Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.
    Let us emulate Charlie Kirk and engage in respectful debate.  Let us not resort to comparing our fellow citizens to the worst of our opponents (or Allies) in WWII.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

  • Tuesday, July 9, 2024

    Deadly Chicago


    For John, BLUF:  Chicago sufferss from shootings every weekend, but Mayor J9hnson has not broken the code on the problem.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From Newsweek, by Reporter Khaleda Rahman, 9 July 2024, 4:35 AM EDT.

    Here is the lede plus two:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson appeared to suggest President Richard Nixon was to blame for the city's pervasive gun violence problem.

    More than 100 people were injured in shootings in Chicago, at least 19 of them fatally, over the Fourth of July weekend, when there is often a spike in gun violence.

    "We are standing here today talking about a violent weekend because of generations of disinvestment and deep disenfranchisement in the exact communities where so much of the violence has taken place," Johnson, a Democrat who took office last year, said during a press conference on Monday.

    Further down we have this from Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson:
    "Black death has been unfortunately been accepted in this country for a very long time. We had a chance 60 years ago to get at the root causes. And people mocked President Johnson, and we ended up with Richard Nixon. I'm going to work hard every day to transform this city. That's what it takes to build a better, stronger, safer Chicago."
    The article then goes on to say:
    Johnson did not elaborate further on his remarks about Nixon. His office has been contacted for comment via email.

    The Richard Nixon Foundation responded to Johnson's remarks on social media.

    "Mayor Johnson's reference to President Nixon is gratuitous and the facts are not on his side in his characterization of Richard Nixon and the Nixon administration's civil rights record," the foundation wrote in a thread on X, formerly Twitter, along with a list of the administration's accomplishments.

    Firat, the situation in Chicago is very bad.  It is way past time to note the deaths of Black youths, often as innocent bystanders in gang like shootings.  This seems like an issue regarding parental responsibility.  What is it in the culture of Chicago where parents do not feel responsibility for teaching their children it is not OK to shoot your way out of a problem.

    Which leads to the issue of blaming President Richard Nixon, who left office in 1974 and passed away in 1994.  A better historic look-back should expose us to the fact that President Johnson's welfare reforms, meant to help Blacks succeed, seerved to badly damage the Black family.

    This view was presented in 1965, by then Assistant Secretary of Labor Daniel Patrick Moynihan, in his report The Negro Family:  The Case For National Action, commonly known as the Moynihan Report.  Wikipedia summed it up by "Moynihan argued that the rise in black single-mother families was caused not by a lack of jobs, but by a destructive vein in ghetto culture, which could be traced to slavery times and continued discrimination in the American South under Jim Crow."

    Culture matters and Mayor Johnson would help the problem by strengthening the culture in Chicago, with an emphsis on families.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Wednesday, March 27, 2024

    Immigrants Learning


    For John, BLUF:  Just because it was OK where you came from does not mean it is OK here.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From PJ Media, by Comedian Kevin Downey, Jr, 25 March 2024, 3:46 PM.

    Here is the lede plus three:

    A peek at the Danish crime statistics from 2010-2021 delivered a gut punch to the globalists looking to tear down Western cultures by gavaging "asylum seekers" into Europe and North America. It turns out that Muslims commit violent crimes way more than people of Danish descent.

    Back in 2020, Mattias Tesfaye, Denmark's minister for Immigration and Integration, did the unthinkable and decided to create a category for criminals from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), mostly Arab and/or Muslim nations. Guess what Denmark learned? MENA immigrants have a higher tendency for unemployment and violent crime than any other ethnic group in Denmark.

    Leftists flipped their wigs when Denmark "singled out" the group — largely Muslim men — for committing the lion's share of crimes.

    "Amazing, why not give them a little symbol to stitch on their clothes, so we can keep an eye on them," a social media commentator blasted, trying desperately to compare the peaceful Jews of Europe sent to concentration camps with the violent and unemployed Muslims of Denmark.

    The article contains this little gem:  "Muslim/Arab men are convicted for rape in Denmark seven times more than Danish-born men."  This suggests that different cultures may have different values.  This, in turn, raises questions of immigration.  Are you, as an immigrant, supposed to adapt to the host culture, or should you be able to bring your culture with you?

    We should be open to other cultures.  The Amish live in the United States without issues.  In the same way, there are Orthodox Jewish Commnunities, like Kiryas Joel, that are an entity, but fit like a puzzle piece in the larger puzzle of the United States.  However, the host nation must make clear that outside the specific immigrant community, host nation laws will be applied.  And sometimes within the immigrant community, for example, Sati (or Suttee) would likely not be tolerated in this nation.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Saturday, February 17, 2024

    Desiring a Polite Society


    For John, BLUF:  we are no longer a polite society, but one where everyone is a possible enemy.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From The Conservative Woman (UK), by Commentor Frederick Edward, 16 February 2024.

    Here is the lede plus four:

    TRYING to enter a Boots the other afternoon I had to wait to be buzzed in. According to a sign on the door this was because of a recent spate of aggressive behaviour towards its employees:  as such, after 5pm, entry into the shop was controlled.

    This was not, may I add, in some inner-city slum, but in an average retail park in an average town.

    Similar trends are visible elsewhere.  Petrol stations near me – though it tends to be the nicer ones with an M&S or Little Waitrose bolted on – have started employing security guards.  These shops, which previously had no bouncers, have for the last few years had two on duty at any time.

    Obviously this is necessary owing to a rapid increase in both scummy behaviour towards its employees and an increase in theft (or, as it is euphemistically called in retail, ‘shrink’).

    It is a sad token of society’s general direction, and one borne out by statistics. Reported recently was that violence and abuse against shop workers had risen 50 per cent year-on-year, and that the total lost to shoplifting has reached an all-time high of £1.8billion.  Such are the records that are broken in 21st century Britain.

    When I was youbg we were taught it was an honor to live in these United States.  Yes, you could assert that it was that wy for Caucasians, but I would suggest World War Two showed that it was so for other folks also.♠  All being happy to be here♥  we treated each otherr with rewpect.

    Today, with the division of the natoin into oppressors and the oppressed, and with gradations therein, we are not one people, but a swrl of bickeering sub-nations.  I had hopes that President Obama would begin the healing process, but it didn't advance past his Attorney General Eric Holder saying "We need to have a conversation,"  Surprisingly, President Trump seemed to make some small progress.,  Candidate Biden promised to bring us together, but there has been no follow-through.

    The person who will lead us out of this morass is the one who will show respect to all and build trust between groups, offering the American Dream to all.  someone who will build a concensus on what we owe to help marginalized groups their own opportunities and fair share.  Someone who will support the idea that respect goes in all directions and that the sins of the past are for historic review and lesson learning and not a way of creating new groups to be eschewed.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    ♠  Just for example, the Navajo Code Talkers, the 442nd Regimentsl Combat Team (Go For Broke) and the Tuskeegee Airmen (thank you Mrs Roosevelt).
    ♥  Not everyone who immigrated to the United States was happy to be here.  A surprisingly large number returned to their home countries, and that is fine.

    Tuesday, April 11, 2023

    "Truth, Justice, and the American Way"


    For John, BLUF:  Literature is a pretty big universe and I can't hope to real all the books and watch all the movies in my lifetime.  But, I am bothered when themes or characters are not just emulated, but stolen, changing the original model.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From Substack, by Journalist Don Surber, 20 March 2023.

    Here is the lede plus nine:

    Disney’s ABC attacked Ron DeSantis and other conservatives for using the word woke, in a piece headlined, “What does ‘woke’ mean and why are some conservatives using it? The definition of ‘woke’ changes depending on who you ask.”

    The quote marks are unnecessary and the Oxford English Dictionary defines its current use as an adjective as, ahem, “Originally: well-informed, up-to-date.  Now chiefly: alert to racial or social discrimination and injustice; frequently in stay woke (often used as an exhortation).”

    But ABC insisted on bashing conservatives for using the word.

    Published January 20, 2023, the piece said, “The term has since been co-opted by some Republicans as a pejorative term this midterm election cycle to signify the identity-based social justice issues that some Democrats and progressives push for, representatives from the Democrat Governors Association and Working Families Party tell ABC News.”

    By co-opted, ABC means used. Apparently, conservatives are not supposed to share the same language with liberals.

    The reason lefty loons hate conservatives using woke as an adjective is the backlash against woke.  The left is poisoning society with political correctness, with a poison that is worse than kryptonite because it almost killed Superman.  Making him gay and an illegal alien crippled the comic because readers want a hero, not a propagandist.

    That is changing.

    Breitbart reported, “The upcoming Superman movie to be directed by James Gunn is set to restore the ‘American way’ portion of Superman’s ages-old motto after DC Comics removed the patriotic segment back in 2021.

    “As Breitbart News reported in October of 2021, DC Comics dumped the Man of Steel’s ‘America’ replacing it with ‘a better tomorrow’ by rewriting the original slogan — ‘truth, justice, and the American way’ — to read ‘truth, justice, and a better tomorrow.’”

    Welcome back to the USA, Clark Kent.  His DC Comics is owned by Discovery as part of its purchase of CNN and the like.

    I am glad to see Superman back as his orignal, 1940s, form.  A more "Woke" versiono didn't meet my needs.  I am looking forward to the new Superman movie.

    That said, as a friend in San Francisco reminded me, Superman isn't a human.  He is from Krypton.  In the 1930s, when Superman was conceived, the tendency would have been for a anthropomorphic view of aliens.  Besides, the story line wouldn't work out if Clark Kent had the pointy ears of Spock. a Vulcan.

    But, this raises some interesting questions.  What if Kal-El (renamed Clark Kent) had landed on a sharecropping farm in rural Alabama?  Would he still have appeared as a Caucasian or would his powers allow him to appear as a Black child?  Would he have ended up in Metropolis, or would it have been Montgomery?  What would truth, justice and the American Way have meant during that period of segregation and Jim Crow?

    And, while returning Superman to his cisgender Caucasian male roots meets the needs of tens of millions of Americans, should there not be legitimate heroes for people of other races and genders?♠  There is, for example, Supergirl.  While they might, or might not, appeal to me, individually, they are a legitimate source of inspiration for those who are Hispanic, or Black or Asain or LGBT or whoever.  But, perhaps they should not be the fictional heroes of the past, reformatted.  Would that not be cultural appropriation?  Same themes, but new personalities.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    ♠  Until the day when we can all celebrate other peoples' heroes.

    Sunday, April 10, 2022

    Transition Closets


    For John, BLUF:  The idea is you go off to school the way your parents dress you, and then, once at school, you chaange into those cloths that best represent who you think you are (gendere wise).  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From The Daily Wire, by reporter Ben Zeisloft, 23 February 2022.

    Here is the lede:

    A high school in Oakland, California, is creating a “transition closet” that will allow students to come to school in clothes that their “parents approve of” and change into the clothing of their selected gender identities.
    It really does seem like the public schools against the parents.

    My nagging questiion is under what circumstnces can the Parents say "Enough!" and release their child to the school for housing, feeding, clothing and general supervision?  If the path the parents are on for raising their child is no longer satisfctory to their Lordships at the school, is it not time to transition the child to the school, full time.

    I expect, a hundred years on, if the United States is still around, this will be seen as child abuse.

    That said, adults should be free to identify as they wish.  And to have surgury and drugs as they see fit.  As with, from my childhood, Ms Christine Jorgensen.  But, Ms Jorganson was in her twenties when she sought surgury.  An adult.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Tuesday, March 29, 2022

    The Othering of Others


    For John, BLUF:  When I was growing up we were still dividing by race, religion and erthnicity.  We seem to have overcome that and are now down to assigning those we disagree with to disfavored categories.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From Town Hall, by Reporter Matt Vespa, 24 March 2022, 1:45 PM.

    Here is the lede plus two:

    The Left has a Nazi fetish. They have an unhealthy obsession with Adolf Hitler.  Maybe it’s because they all secretly want to be him?  After all, he built death camps, put people he hated into them, and systemically murdered them.  It’s what liberals want to do with anyone with whom they disagree, so roughly half the country.  Everything they hate is rooted in racism, sexism, misogyny, or Nazism.  It’s the same old game, but it’s not reaching levels of mockery that we really haven’t approached yet.  I have never seen an op-ed that argues that working out and exercising is akin to Nazism.  It’s all here.  Exercise is a far-right activity.  You cannot make this up (via MSNBC):
    It appears the far right has taken advantage of pandemic at-home fitness trends to expand its decade-plus radicalization of physical mixed martial arts (MMA) and combat sports spaces.

    Earlier this month, researchers reported that a network of online “fascist fitness” chat groups on the encrypted platform Telegram are recruiting and radicalizing young men with neo-Nazi and white supremacist extremist ideologies.  Initially lured with health tips and strategies for positive physical changes, new recruits are later invited to closed chat groups where far-right content is shared.

    Makes me not want to walk laps in the house, or up and down the driveway, for fear that my neighbors with "Black Lives Matter" Flags think I am another Nazi, embedded in a Democratic Party voting City.

    Apparently, in the minds of many, the best way to fight fascism is to be a fascist.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Wednesday, December 15, 2021

    Star Chamber?


    For John, BLUF:  Whixh should be controlling when it comes to social/cultural issues, the welcoming nation or the culture of the immigrants coming in?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    BBC:  “The verdict cannot be appealed and the jail sentence is unconditional, meaning that it must be served.”

    Freom Legal Insurrection, by Blogger Vijeta Uniyal, 14 December 2021, 11:30am.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    On Monday, Denmark’s high-power court convicted Inger Stoejberg, who served as the country’s immigration minister between 2015-19, for ordering the separation of refugees couples if the woman was under 18.

    Stoejberg’s 2016 order, as she argues, was aimed at stamping out the practice of child brides who were being imported into the country in the wake of the migrant wave. “A total of 23 couples were separated, with the wives ranging in age from 15 to 17 years,” Germany’s DW News reported.

    Here is the really disturbing part of the story, which is why the title of this Blog:
    The so-called Impeachment Court, specially set up for Stoejberg’s trial, “agreed that the order had violated Danish law and the European Convention on Human Rights,” the TV network Euronews reported.
    It seems to me that if a nation has age restrictions on marriages they should be enforced on everyone.  Otherwise they should be changed to reflect what is being allowed for some.  A two tiered system is inherently unequal.

    Considering that in the West young teenage bridges were accepted several centuries ago it might be the way to go, except that in our current culture education suggests that 18 is a reasonable marriage age for all.  Our culture expects youth to stay in school until graduation from high school.  It is a reasonable expectation for society today.

    A special court for Ms Stoejberg seems fishy to me.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Saturday, September 11, 2021

    Does Society Help Shape IQ?


    For John, BLUF:  Is the Author correct?  I don't know, but it is worth considering.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From The American Mind, by Ms Helen Roy, 31 Agust 2021.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    The Flynn effect and its reversal are topics of scientific inquiry by which, should you find yourself inching toward politically incorrect conclusions, cancellation looms ominously.

    In 2016, in a systematic literature review of all major accounts of the post-seventies IQ plummet across Western countries, Edward Dutton of the Ulster Institute for Social Research concluded that the best explanation for the dawdling of the Western mind had both environmental and genetic components.  The industrial revolution’s technological advances, he argued, precipitated massive gains on IQ scores “by establishing an environment which compelled us to think in a more scientific way, compelled us to become more educated, and saturated us with knowledge, information, and novel problems.”

    But industry simultaneously brought “dysgenic fertility” practices.  It precipitated a decline in fertility, especially for wealthy people, and those with weaker genetic material were able to survive and themselves procreate whereas they would have died in previous centuries.  Dutton determined that the Flynn Effect is best explained as temporary superficial adaptation to new forms of education which disguised postindustrial genetic degradation for a period of time—until the truth of dysgenic fertility could overcome the effects of the new educational environment, a reversal which he identified as the negative Flynn effect.  These conclusions, as well as his other forays into forbidden areas of scientific knowledge caused several problems for Dutton, namely his disaffiliation from the Ulster Institute.

    This article asks if sociatal changes post 1970s might have impacted IQ.  The author suggest no-fault divorce, more women in the workforce and day-care for pre-school children.  These are issues worth exploring.  The tradeoffs may well be worthwhile.  However, acceptance of the change in IQ should be with full knowledge of the pluses and minuses.

    Who are the people in Lowell who might best kick off an exploration of this issue?  Are there political constraints on people getting off the approved path to look into these kinds of issues?

    One quibble.  The writer tags then Governor Ronald Reagan with no-fault divorce.  The legislation came from State Assemblyman Jim Hayes, of Long Beach, a devoted Father.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Saturday, July 24, 2021

    Dictating What is Good Taste


    For John, BLUF:  One of the ideas behind a Presidential Czabinet is that it serves as a group of advisors to the President.  If you make it big enough it will fail in that function.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    The Founders knew what they were doing when they separated art and state.

    By Jeff Jacoby Globe Columnist,Updated July 24, 2021, 3:00 a.m..

    Here is the lede plus two:

    On Aug. 18, 1787, at the constitutional convention in Philadelphia, Charles Pinckney of South Carolina proposed nearly a dozen powers with which he thought the new federal government should be invested.  Among them: the authority “to establish seminaries for the promotion of literature and the arts and sciences.”

    Pinckney’s list was referred to the Committee on Detail, and some of his suggestions, such as federal responsibility for patents and copyright, were incorporated into the Constitution.  But his idea of empowering Congress to promote the arts was ignored.

    The delegates were learned, cosmopolitan men who understood the value of literature, music, and art.  They knew that in the Old World it was normal for artists to be sustained by royal benefaction.  Indeed, King George III was an avid cultural patron whose largesse had made possible the founding of the Royal Academy of Arts.  But the men in Philadelphia intended the government they were fashioning to steer clear of such involvement.  Consequently, nothing in the Constitution so much as hints that overseeing art and culture is a job for the federal government.

    Mr Jeff Jacoby has this by the right end.  We don't need a federal level culture minister.  The tastes in Maine are not likely to be the same as the tasts in Puerto Rico or San Diego or Honolulu or Fairbanks.  Well, maybe Fairbanks, but how about Seattle or Portland?

    This project would be another boondoggle, costing the Taxpayers millions upon millions of dollars.  At the same time it would put the Federal Government in the business of picking winners and losers.  How will they know what is good art for today and for a century from today?

    This kind of thing goes against the principle of subsidiarity.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Friday, May 7, 2021

    Who Are the Police?


    For John, BLUF:  For over a year now we have had groups carving out their own little territories, like CHAZ in Seattle.  This is not a good will to build a peaceful, happy, community.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From J Media, by Reporter Victoria Taft, 7 May 2021, 9:36 AM ET.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    Portland’s revolutionaries from Black Lives Matter and antifa took over a busy street at noon on Wednesday and pulled guns on drivers who dared try to dart past the mob.  The groups were holding a rally for a gangland shooter who was killed by police in 2018.  That shooting was ruled justified (more below).

    The chaotic scene included guns being drawn on white drivers by the multiracial BLM and antifa protesters and one driver drew his own weapon in reply.  Someone deployed pepper spray.

    I don't think this is a good trend.  For a long time we have depended on the Police to police our streets.  Now, in some parts of the country, we are leaving it to private armies.  Are we turning into Mexico?

    Some people think they are building a better America, but they are, in fact, destroying the fabric of our society and creating an alternative culture, and not a good one.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Friday, April 16, 2021

    Iconoclastic Richmond


    For John, BLUF:  Richmond, Virginia used to have a stretch of road with many statues, mostly of Confederate States of America Civil War leaders, but also of Tennis Great Arthur Ashe, a Richmond native.  Now much has been torn down.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    The city’s iconoclastic frenzy, supported by local leaders, has left a historic avenue with stumps and graffiti.

    From City Journal, by Writer Catesby Leigh, 11 April 2021.

    Here is the lede plus four:

    Beautifully landscaped with ample medians and harmoniously lined with gracious houses in various historic styles, Richmond, Virginia’s block-paved Monument Avenue and its several statuary tributes to Confederate leaders were once recognized as a triumph of American urban design.  The residential frontages served admirably as a variegated frame for the monuments, creating a superb urban tableau that it made no sense to eradicate—especially as the monuments lost ideological currency with the passage of time, as monuments often do.  But after the mayhem triggered by George Floyd’s fatal arrest in Minneapolis in May 2020, the 14 blocks of the avenue comprising a National Historic Landmark District present a sorry spectacle. Bare pedestals, with the vandals’ graffiti not entirely washed away, stand on the avenue’s median. Statues of General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, the cavalry commander J. E. B. Stuart, Confederate president Jefferson Davis, and the world-renowned oceanographer Matthew Fontaine Maury, who played an inconspicuous role in the Confederate war effort, are gone—victims of fanaticism fueled by Twitter slogans drawing, in turn, on national-guilt and systemic-racism narratives in which Americans have been increasingly indoctrinated.

    The magnificent bronze equestrian statue of Robert E. Lee still stands at the center of a turfed circle 200 feet wide that is Monument Avenue’s principal node and was the point of departure for its creation at the end of the nineteenth century.  But the monument’s majestically rusticated, 40-foot-tall granite pedestal has been hideously defaced by Black Lives Matter agitators’ spray-painting.  The circle, previously enclosed within a ring of heavily graffitied jersey barriers, and, since January, within an additional ring of chain-link fencing eight feet tall, degenerated into an anarchists’ playground last year.  The New York Times Style Magazine has perversely hailed the monument’s nihilistic “transformation” as the most influential work of “protest art” since World War II.

    Located in the Confederacy’s capital, Monument Avenue was the South’s most important venue for commemoration of the Lost Cause.  The quality of its statuary was of a distinctly higher order than the many undistinguished, often cheaply mass-produced “Silent Sentinel” statues of lone Confederate soldiers, standing at parade rest in front of many a courthouse portico—not to mention Stone Mountain, Georgia’s huge, kitschy relief of Lee, Jackson, and Davis on horseback.

    While Americans overwhelmingly deplore the vandalization or destruction of statues of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Frederick Douglass and other abolition advocates, as well as figures of Christ and the Virgin Mary, Confederate monuments have a far more precarious hold on public affections.  In recent years—and particularly during Donald Trump’s presidency—they have become increasingly controversial in the South itself.  Since the BLM protests erupted, dozens of these monuments have been banished from courthouse squares, parks, and other public spaces, from the Carolinas to Texas—in small towns as well as big cities.

    In Virginia, which has seen the most dramatic outburst of defacement and officially sanctioned removal of monuments of any state, opinion has been split on the fate of the Confederate landmarks.  A September 2020 Associated Press poll found 46 percent of Virginians in favor of removal and 42 percent opposed, with a margin of error of 4 percent.  While the South leans red on the whole, Virginia is blue.  And despite years of mass-media vilification of all things Confederate, and Virginia Republicans generally treating the monuments issue like kryptonite, the state has seen nothing like a solid consensus supporting removal.  That hasn’t prevented politicians like Virginia governor Ralph Northam and Richmond mayor Levar Stoney from getting with the iconoclastic program.  The legality of their efforts is dubious in Richmond’s case.  But while the damage will almost certainly not be reversed where most of the city’s Confederate statues are concerned, Northam’s June 2020 order for the removal of the Lee equestrian is another matter.

    We are talking rage here.  Rage is not, over the long haul, an attractive trait.  The other side of this coin is that it is not balancing out history, but rather throwing a cloak over it, so we can't see it.  If we can't see it we can't learn from it.  Do many think that ignoring history is better than learning from it?  I am sure, well, relatively sure, they didn't pull the Statue of Mr Arthur Ashe.

    Better than tearing down statues is (1) learning history and (2) seeing if we can see any good, any growth, in misguided men, and reform ourselves.

    In the short term this may be helpful to some, but in the long term this slows reconciliation.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Monday, April 12, 2021

    The Right to be Wrong


    For John, BLUF:  We are facing a crackdown on dissident views the Victorians or the Puritans would be proud of.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    Big Tech threatens to ban nonprofit for discussing alleged election fraud

    From The Spectator US, by "Cockburn", 5 April 2021, 9:54 am.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    Over three-quarters of Republicans believe that there was widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election and about a third of all Americans believe that President Biden’s win was illegitimate.  When tens of millions of Americans lose faith in the system, that spells serious trouble for democracy.  A normal and healthy country would allow a fair and open debate about whether or not fraud occurred, and, if so, how much fraud and what evidence exists to back up these claims.  Instead, Big Tech platforms have repeatedly censored any mention of voter fraud at all.

    Such was the case late last week when YouTube and Vimeo pulled a video interview with Trump lawyer John Eastman.  Cockburn’s colleague and The Spectator‘s Washington editor, Amber Athey, is a fellow at the Steamboat Institute and was invited to conduct the interview with Eastman at an event in Colorado.  The event was called, ‘What Really Happened?  An Insider’s Perspective on Representing the President and Claims of Election Fraud.’

    Information does want to be free, but Big Tech is going to try to stifle it.  Thus the old fashioned sin of gossip will still flourish in the age of electronics.  Unless we go to a totalitarian regime, where all fear being reported to "the authorities" by friends and relatives, people will exchange information on the side.  It is slower that the Main Stream Media, but works as well.  It is what fueled the exchange of ideas in pre-Revolutionary War America.  Even in the Soviet Union there was the Samizdat Press.

    However, today we do face the practice of Social Credit, as practiced in China.  To quote Wikipedia,

    The social credit initiative calls for the establishments of unified record system for individuals, businesses and the government to be tracked and evaluated for trustworthiness.  Initial reports suggested that the system utilized numerical score as the reward and punishment mechanism; recent reports suggest there are in fact multiple, different forms of the social credit system being experimented with.  Numerical system has been implemented only in several regional pilot programs, while the nationwide regulatory method has been based primarily on blacklisting and whitelisting.  The credit system is closely related to China's mass surveillance systems such as Skynet, which incorporates facial recognition system, big data analysis technology, AI and Project Maven.
    But, back in the United States, we are doing a cancel culture thing, where one is considered PNG (persona non grata) for holding the wrong views.  Thus Big Tech censoring certain produced materials.  Until we rebuild a concensus that information needs to be free, so that approaches to problems can be democratically determined, we will have censorship,  Until we learn to tolerate the views of others we will not be a Democracy in the best sense of the world.  We need to learn that people have the right to be wrong.  They don't have the right to impose their wrong thinking on others, but they have the right to hold wrong views.

    Hat tip to my Wife.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Thursday, April 8, 2021

    Narrow Minds


    For John, BLUF:  Those pushing "White Supremacy" as the key to unlocking the secrets of society have a narrow view of society and of history.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From The American Conservative, by Commentator Rod Dreher, 8 April 2021, 7:51 PM.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    Writing at Yahoo! News, Prof. Jennifer Ho, president of the Association of Asian American Studies and a faculty member at the University of Colorado Boulder, would like you to know that when black people attack Asians, it’s really white people’s fault:
    The point I’ve made through all of those experiences is that anti-Asian racism has the same source as anti-Black racism: white supremacy.  So when a Black person attacks an Asian person, the encounter is fueled perhaps by racism, but very specifically by white supremacy.  White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it.
    This makes everything the fault of Caucasian males of European origin.  That they represent a culture is not relevant.  It is the wrong culture.  However, it is a serious question to ask, if Admiral Zheng He had sailed East, rather than West, in 1405, would the West still be the wrong culture, or would it be an oppressed minority under the colonial thumb of another culture?

    Later in the article is this summation of the state of academia.

    This is what totalitarians do: they destroy the cultural memories of a people in order to make them easier to control.  It is gobsmacking that the gatekeepers and guardians of educational institutions are capitulating in the destruction of the institutions they have been charged with defending.

    Why would anyone want to go into academics today?  Serious question.  I keep saying it over and over, and maybe somebody will believe me and act:  all those who want to save the humanities in this Dark Age had better stop trying to shore up this rotten imperium, and instead start building the equivalent of early medieval monasteries:  communities within which knowledge and traditional academic practices can survive this barbarian epoch.  I’m not exaggerating.  It’s that serious.

    Perhaps, as we broaden our knowledge of other cultures, and of world history, we will come to appreciate what contributions Western Cukture has made.

    Perhaps we will come to realize the Declaration of independence promised more than mere mortals could deliver all at once, but that it was a framework for overcoming our own narrow views and for making it a better world.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Tuesday, April 6, 2021

    Our Changing Culture


    For John, BLUF:  We look back at the Victorian Era and think how quaint their ideas were.  I wonder if those who follow us will look back on us and think the same way.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    Americans privately fear these rules, while publicly appearing to accept them.

    From American Greatness, by Historian Victor Davis Hanson, 31 March 2021.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    There are 10 new ideas that are changing America, maybe permanently.

    . . .

    Americans privately fear these rules, while publicly appearing to accept them.

    Professor Hanson lists ten items, and they all reflect how we are evolving.  And not in a good way.

    I am optomistic.  As a Republic we had a glaring defect early on, which gave us a Civil War.  Then we had segregation, which limited life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but we mostly made it go away.  We do need a “spiritual” revival that revives the belief in hard work and personal trust that elevates all.  I think of our Nation's Capitol's Quadrants and the contrast I remember from 25 years ago between NE and SE.  If SE can be more like NE and we can avoid a major nuclear blowup with a resurgent (after 500 years) China, or an all out war in the Ukraine, things are going to be peachy. Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Friday, February 12, 2021

    Watch Your Acronyms (and Initialisms)


    For John, BLUF:  This is San Francisco, which might be used as an excuse.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From Hot Air, by Captain Ed Morrissey, 2 February 2021, 11:25.

    This appears to be more of a class issue than a race issue.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Monday, December 28, 2020

    Losing our Culture, Losing our Orientation


    For John, BLUF:  This is about Lawrence Public Schools banning the classic Greek Homeric tale, The Odyssey♠.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    A Massachusetts school has banned ‘The Odyssey.’

    From The Wall Street Journal, by Journal Reporter Meghan Cox Gurdon, 27 December 2020.

    Here is the lede plus two:

    A sustained effort is under way to deny children access to literature. Under the slogan #DisruptTexts, critical-theory ideologues, schoolteachers and Twitter agitators are purging and propagandizing against classic texts—everything from Homer to F. Scott Fitzgerald to Dr. Seuss.

    Their ethos holds that children shouldn’t have to read stories written in anything other than the present-day vernacular—especially those “in which racism, sexism, ableism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of hate are the norm,” as young-adult novelist Padma Venkatraman writes in School Library Journal.  No author is valuable enough to spare, Ms. Venkatraman instructs:  “Absolving Shakespeare of responsibility by mentioning that he lived at a time when hate-ridden sentiments prevailed, risks sending a subliminal message that academic excellence outweighs hateful rhetoric.”

    The subtle complexities of literature are being reduced to the crude clanking of “intersectional” power struggles.  Thus Seattle English teacher Evin Shinn tweeted in 2018 that he’d “rather die” than teach “The Scarlet Letter,” unless Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel is used to “fight against misogyny and slut-shaming.”

    We get to the part about Lawrence, Massachusetts further down in the article:
    The demands for censorship appear to be getting results.  “Be like Odysseus and embrace the long haul to liberation (and then take the Odyssey out of your curriculum because it’s trash),” tweeted Shea Martin in June.  “Hahaha,” replied Heather Levine, an English teacher at Lawrence (Mass.) High School.  “Very proud to say we got the Odyssey removed from the curriculum this year!”  When I contacted Ms. Levine to confirm this, she replied that she found the inquiry “invasive.”  The English Department chairman of Lawrence Public Schools, Richard Gorham, didn’t respond to emails.

    “It’s a tragedy that this anti-intellectual movement of canceling the classics is gaining traction among educators and the mainstream publishing industry,” says science-fiction writer Jon Del Arroz, one of the rare industry voices to defend Ms. Cluess.  “Erasing the history of great works only limits the ability of children to become literate.”

    Since I live just down the 495 Freeway from Lawrence, in Lowell, Massachusettts, I got this EMail from someone out on the Coast:
    Cliff,

    Did you see the attached article from yesterday’s WSJ?  Don’t you live in Lawrence?  Is it true that they have removed The Odyssey from the high school reading list?

    Did you know about this?  If so, why didn’t the citizens burn the high school to the ground?  Why didn’t they picket in front of Ms Levine’s and Mr. Gorman’s houses?

    Of course I was outraged at being confused with someone living in Lawrence, but we all have to live somewhere.  I composed a reply:
    NO, I DON’T LIVE IN LAWRENCE!!!

    Too bad I am on my iPhone.  Otherwise I would put it in red.

    Yes, I saw the article.  I will bring it up with the lady in charge of Lowell Curriculum the next time I see her, Robin Desmond.  Not the infamous Robin DiAngelo.  By the way, teachers can be found living all over, from Maine to Connecticut.

    I am not advocating burning anything down, but this is a sign that “the long march through the institutions”♥ is resulting in the loss of those Anglo-Saxon values that gave us freedom of thought and action and helped us think our way out of human sacrifice, slavery and genocide.

    Just a little while back Lawrence schools “went into receivership” and were taken over by the state.  I think DESE gave back control recently.

    I am embarrassed that Lawrence is five miles up the 495.  Just as I am sure, deep down inside, you are embarrassed by that previously wonderful City, Portland.  Local leadership is important.  Obviously lacking in both locations.

    My concern, as I stated to my interlocator, is that it has taken centuries, maybe millenia, to get to where we are.  We are not perfect, but the Anglo-Saxon heritage has gotten us from living in trees and painting ourselves blue♦ to where we have a democracy going and are recognizing each other has humans, worthy of respect.  We aren't perfect, but we are on the path.  To continue to move forward we need to know from whence we came, thus history and literature are important. Confederate General Robert E Lee is important because he was one of those who showed grace and grew in his understanding of humanity.  Do we think we are so smaarth that we can invent a perfect humanity without seeing the path along which we came?  That would border on hubris, which the Greek stories help us to understand.

    Automobile Magnete Henry Ford said "History is bunk."  While Mr Ford was a very bright and practical man, he missed the boat on history.  One does not start building the Empire State Building at the 100th floor,  So, one does not start building a political and social culture without looking at the hundreds of years of substructure.  In the United States we have built up an Anglo-Saxon substrata, with cultural additions from around the world.  That substrata builds up what the Romans and Greeks gave us, and our Hebrew forefathers.  And all of those came from previous civilizations.

    We have overcome some human traditions that turned out to not be congeniel to Democracy.  For example, when those of us from Europe came to the Western Hemisphere we stamped out human sacrifice, which I think was a good thing.  We learned to overcome our human habit of slavery.  Not all at once, but by and large we have eliminated it.  And, even today we see signs of genocide here and there, but we recoil at it, even if we can't always stop it.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    ♠  The Odyssey is one of two major ancient Greek epic poems attributed to Homer.  It follows the Greek hero Odysseus, king of Ithaca, and his ten year journey after victory in the Trojan War.
    ♥  Thanks to German Marxist Rudi Dutschke for this phrase explaining how Marxism would overcome the Western Liberal approach.
    ♦  A characterization I picked up from a Staff Course Classmate from India, who attributed it to his Father, a Sergeant Major in the Indian Army during WWII.  Long story, a cultural misunderstanding, for another time.

    Wednesday, September 16, 2020

    Cancel "Cancel Culture"


    For John, BLUF:  This is a month old, but still timely.  The Writer thinks "the phrase cancel culture is too vague — a distraction from a deeper examination of power in society.".  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    A reporter’s last thoughts before putting the phrase to rest.

    From The New York Times, by Reporter Jonah Engel Bromwich, 14 August 2020.

    Here is the lede plus four:

    I made a promise to myself. Having had the privilege of appearing on “The Daily,” and having used that privilege to discuss “cancel culture” over the course of not one, but two episodes, I would not write about the phrase ever again.

    Then I got an email from a colleague who kindly asked me if I would write this newsletter.

    If you listened to the episodes, you know that I started thinking about the phrase “cancel culture” in 2018. That year, the word “canceled,” which had originally circulated as a joke on Black Twitter, began to be used more widely to describe a dynamic frequently playing out on social media. A person would say or do something that was offensive to others, and those people would call out the offender.

    Lisa Nakamura, a professor I talked to then, called it a “cultural boycott” — an agreement not to amplify, signal-boost or give money to the person who’s been canceled. In some cases, as the phenomenon developed, “cancellation” could turn punitive, even causing some offenders to be fired from their jobs.

    People tend to see cancellation as either wholly good — there are new consequences for saying or doing racist, bigoted or otherwise untenable things — or wholly bad, in that people can lose their reputations and in some cases their jobs, all because a mob has taken undue offense to a clumsy or out-of-context remark. Personally, I think it’s best viewed not as either positive or negative, but as something else: a new development in the way that power works — a development brought about by social media.

    I take the Writer's point.  For someone to be fired because of a tweet storm seems a little unfair.  And the actions suggest a "Zero Defects" approach to life.  Sadly, we are dealing with humans and there are always defects, mistakes.  Defects can be reducted by having people pay more attention to what they are doing.  We should work on that.  But, we need a little humanity and humility.

    Pointing out mistakes, errors, slips, is fine.  However, it should not automatically trip the guillotine.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Thursday, May 28, 2020

    The COVID-19 Virus Discriminates


    For John, BLUF:  That is, it picks on the most vulnerable, and we need to understand the vulnerabilities in order to push back and win.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    Here is the sub-headline:

    Beyond perception and ideology, there are starkly different realities for red and blue America right now.

    From The New York Times, by Reporters Jennifer Medina and Robert Gebeloff, 25 May 2020.

    Here is the lede plus one:

    The staggering American death toll from the coronavirus, now approaching 100,000, has touched every part of the country, but the losses have been especially acute along its coasts, in its major cities, across the industrial Midwest, and in New York City.

    The devastation, in other words, has been disproportionately felt in blue America, which helps explain why people on opposing sides of a partisan divide that has intensified in the past two decades are thinking about the virus differently.  It is not just that Democrats and Republicans disagree on how to reopen businesses, schools and the country as a whole.  Beyond perception, beyond ideology, there are starkly different realities for red and blue America right now.

    Democrats are far more likely to live in counties where the virus has ravaged the community, while Republicans are more likely to live in counties that have been relatively unscathed by the illness, though they are paying an economic price.  Counties won by President Trump in 2016 have reported just 27 percent of the virus infections and 21 percent of the deaths — even though 45 percent of Americans live in these communities, a New York Times analysis has found.

    The numbers are interesting, and as this map shows, not equally spread.  The data suggests to me that we should stop looking at the distribution as a political issue or a race issue and think of it in terms of socio-economic and cultural factors.  That is our duty as citizens.

    NB:  The Coronavirus has not gone away in our area, so we need to be polite to others and protect them from infection by wearing our masks in public, by practicing social distancing and by not shaking hands or congregating in public.  It still isn't over.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Monday, May 25, 2020

    You've Got To Have Heart


    For John, BLUF:  Yes, this is old, but it is still timely, and worth it for the clip, at the link, of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers dancing.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




    From Don Surber Blog, by Retired Reporter Don Surber, 14 April 2020.

    Here is the lede plus four:

    Neil Irwin is a senior economics correspondent for the New York Times.  He showcased his ignorance in his latest offering to the public, "Everything Is Awful.  So Why Is the Stock Market Booming?"

    The column is the gloom and doom the left has churned out throughout my lifetime.  Ever since the Great Depression brought us FDR, they have rooted for another one.  Obama disappointed them.  But this time -- under the charismatic, super-intelligent, and definitely not senile Joe Biden -- the nation will finally capitulate and embrace communism, er, um, socialism.

    Irwin wrote, "What on earth is the stock market doing?

    "Death and despair are all around.  The number of people filing for unemployment benefits each of the last two weeks was about 10 times the previous record — and is probably being artificially held back by overloaded government systems.  Vast swaths of American business are shuttered indefinitely.  The economic quarter now underway will most likely feature Great Depression-caliber shrinkage in economic activity.

    "Yet at Thursday’s close, the S&P 500 was up 25% from its recent low on March 23.  It is down only about 14% this year — and is up from its levels of just 11 months ago.  There are answers as to why.  But that doesn’t take away the extremity of the juxtaposition between an economy in free fall and a stock market that is, in the scheme of things, doing just fine."

    Attitude is a big factor in overcoming difficulties.  Muddling through is a start, but as the article goes on to tell us, it is important to pick yourself up.
    Gloom and doom just are not the American way.  The music of the 1930s included mostly uplifting and happy songs.  For "Swing Time," the ultimate Ginger Rogers-Fred Astaire musical, Jerome Kern and lyricist Dorothy Fields gave us "Pick Yourself Up," which was deployed when Rogers taught Astaire to dance. She sang:
    Nothing's impossible I have found,
    For when my chin is on the ground,
    I pick myself up,
    Dust myself off,
    Start all over again.
    And of course he miraculously learned to dance like Fred Astaire.
    I will never dance like Fred Astaire, but I can have that pick myself up attitude.

    Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

    Regards  —  Cliff