Elections in Israel

For John, BLUF:  The Holy Land is not a place where peace can be promised, except Post-Apocolypse.  Nothing to see here; just move along.

---

The end of Netanyahu’s unchecked reign

From Brookings Institution, by Researcher Natan Sachs, 20 September 2019.  This article originally appeared in The Atlantic.

Here is the lede plus one:

Israel’s second election of 2019 managed to produce both high drama and anticlimax.  The top-line result:  There is no clear winner.  Neither the right-wing bloc led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, nor the center-left bloc led by former military Chief of Staff Benny Gantz, commanded a majority of the 120 seats in the 22nd Knesset.  But there was still a loser of sorts:  Netanyahu.

The one thing that was clear, following the election, was that the results signal a dramatic shift in policy. Israel had stepped all the way to the brink on two fundamental issues, and it has now taken a half step back.  These results scuttle Netanyahu’s plans to officially apply Israeli law to parts of the West Bank, annexing the Jordan Valley, and to curtail the Israeli Supreme Court’s powers in order to secure himself immunity from prosecution on corruption charges.  Both issues would have had serious ramifications, the former for the possibility of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the future, and the latter for the health of Israeli democracy.  Tuesday’s results will not produce peace nor resolve Israel’s internal challenges, but they stave off those prospects, at least for the moment.

Mr Sachs is no friend of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, But he seems to do a fair job of laying out the political situation in Israel.

For me the real question is if there can be peace for Israel this side of the Second Coming.  I have my doubts.  We, here in the US, should be prepared to welcome all Israelis if push comes to shove.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff