The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.
Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts

Friday, August 9, 2024

Is Equity Good For All?


Do we make more progress under equality or under equity?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Anchoress, by Ms Elizabeth Scalia, 7 August 2024, 11:37 AM.

Here is the 𝕏 post:

The video of Kamala talking equitable outcomes wld play much better if the outcomes of the so-called “public servant” classes were included in all that equity.  Somehow living in middle class nabes w/reduced health insurances & police & speech protections is never their outcome.
In my mind equality means we all get a fair shot.  This is, I believe, the traditional American ethos, even if not achieved at 100% in practice.  Equity is more a "from each according to his ability; to each according to his need.  To me equity is helping everyone be as fast as Roger Bannister.

As Ms Scalia states, there is doubt as to if we ever see universal equity.  What are Candidates Harris and Walz selling us, and how will they achieve it, and at what cost?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, July 3, 2023

Sports Equality


For John, BLUF:  Men transitioning to women have3 an unfair advantage when competing in women's sports.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

In a June 22 tweet, Boise State professor Scott Yenor compared the women's track and field world records to the championship times of D3 men and high school boys in 2015.

'There are many, many men who are interested in and better at sports than the best women,' Yenor said in a statement.

From Campus Reform, by Associate Editor John Rigolizzo, 27 June 2023, 4:38 pm ET.

Here is the lede plus one:

Boise State political science professor Scott Yenor recently added some hard facts to the debate over biological men competing in women’s sports.

In a June 22 tweet, Yenor compared the women's track and field world records in several events to the championship times of Division III college athletes and state high school championships for men and boys in Louisiana and California. The data showed that college and even some high school athletes are superior to women in track and field.

“How do men and women compare in apples to apples sports comparisons?” Yenor wrote. “Compare women's world record holders to the winners of NCAA Div 3 or high school boys champs in a random year. Answer: men competing in women's sports will crowd out the girls.”

Yenor’s tweet included a table from his book The Recovery of Family Life, comparing the women’s world records in track and field with the NCAA men’s Division III and Louisiana and California boys high school state championships in 2015.

In the 100-meter sprint, the women’s world record was 10.49 seconds; the NCAA men’s Division III championship time was just 10.24 seconds, and the California high school championship time was 10.34 seconds. The Louisiana state championship time was a step behind at 10.91.

I accept thaat there are thoze who wish to change how they present to the world. gender wise.  I have accepted it since Ms Christine Jorgensen travelled to Europe to change from a man to a woman.  On the other hand, I am not impressed by those who go part way in their surgery and hormone treatment.

I believe this should be a non-issue in high school, since I believe that transitioning is a decision for a lifetiem and should not be entered into before one has sufficiently matured.  I put it in the same category as voting, drinking and purchasing a firearm.  Transitioning is a non-reversable decision.  It should not be entered into before one is ready to make a mature decision.

That said, if people transition they should be allowed to compete among themselves in various sports events.  However. they should not disrupt the fair competition among females. an issue that has been an issue for decades, including with Title IX provisions of the Education Amendments of 1972.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, June 30, 2023

Racial Justice


For John, BLUF:  The US Supreme Court came down on racial quotas in college admissions, and rightfully so.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Twitter, by Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democraft from Massachusetts.  "Blue Check"

Here is the Tweet:

Elizabeth Warren
@SenWarren

An extremist Supreme Court has once again reversed decades of settled law, rolled back the march toward racial justice, and narrowed educational opportunity for all. I won't stop fighting for young people with big dreams who deserve an equal chance to pursue their future.

Last edited 12:03 PM · Jun 29, 2023 · 7.1M Views

1,484 Retweets  2,532 Quotes  7,030 Likes  288 Bookmarks

I accept the second sentence as written.

The Senator rails against the upsetting "of settled law".  But, what if it was wrongly settled?  Does she scorn Brown v Board of Education because it overturned decades of settled law??

I am not sure what Senator Warren's vision is for racial justice when she says the decision "rolled back the march toward racial justice".  Does she want a country where the percentsges of people in different positions, and at different levels, match the percentage of that group across the nation, down to a low margin of error?  Do we want to shoehorn people into such a representation of equality?

The Senstor writes about the Supreme Court decision:  "narrowed educational opportunity for all."  All?  It seems to have opened up opportunities for those Asian Americans who had sued Harved.  Unless Harvard is expanding its student body, it is a Zero-sum game  That is, you win, I lose.  Even Senator Warren's former colleagues from Harvard should understand that.

I believe Students for Fair Admission v Harvard♠ was properly settled and I hope to see all progress, based on their individual merit.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  And, the sister case, Students for Fair Admissioon v University of North Caroina.

Monday, January 17, 2022

Today's Holiday


For John, BLUF:  Today is a Federal Holiday and a moment to ponder how we go forward with our Americsn Project.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




I think Dennis Galvin, of Westford, put well Dr King's place in our history.  On the Lowell City Life Show this Friday last he described Dr King is the missing Founding Father.  Dr King was the person who advocated for the equal rights of all people.

Here is Dr King's "I Have A Dream" speech (28 August 1963):

I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today.

It would be nice.  And something for all of us to strive for.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, March 12, 2021

The Hard Way


For John, BLUF:  It is obvious that, from our ranking on the MCAS scores, that we need to do more for our students.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




My thoughts on equity and public schools.

When I first heard the used of the term "equity" with regards to schools, vice "equality", I was skeptical.  I was like my follow City Life Show host, George Anthes.

Then I saw the graphic, with three boys of different heights, trying to watch a baseball game over an outfield fence, and then the companion sketch, with the boys standing on different sized boxes, depend on their individual heights.  It made perfect sense.

Then I wondered about visual acuity.  One boy could have 20/40 vision, a second 20/20, and the third a Ted Williams like ability to read the stitches on the baseball.  And eye-hand coordination.  One might be able to easily grab a pop foul, one might or might not grab it and one might be beaned by it.  Think about reading.  One of those boys may read a 1,000 words a minute and one at 400 and one might struggle over each sentence.

Talents differ.  We can compensate for physical differences, but perhaps not for all natural or nurtured talents.

Which got me to thinking about Schools.  I just finished a book (Tangled up In Blue), by Georgetown Law Professor Rosa Brooks.  In the book the author told about her high school years, when she suffered from some degree of depression.  Approaching high school graduation she had been accepted at Harvard, but her High School Principal was not going to graduate her, for having missed about half her school days.  Fortunately, her Step-Father, a union shop steward, went to the Principal and explained she had gotten out of high school what was to be gained and should be allowed to go to Harvard.

In like manner, my Buddy Jim Peters says that he used to ditch classes and go into the loft of the High School Auditorium and read books.  Yet, he graduated and went on to college, from which he graduated.

In my own case I never cut a class, not even for "Senior Ditch Day" and still managed to graduate in the bottom half of my class.  On the other hand, in geometry, where we did problems in class, I used to rip through them so I could get a magazine in the black of the classroom to read.  I earned an "A" in that class.

My conclusion is that the performance of the student may not necessarily be correlated with teacher contact time.  My expectation is that if we did a thorough evaluation of our COVID Zoom classes that some small percentage of students thrived overall and some thrived in certain classes, while many struggled.  And, perhaps it isn't exactly correlated with in-classroom performance.

What this suggests is that we may be mis-allocating teaching assets.  Not allocating resources equitably.  To cartoon it, some students may learn best with minimal instruction, perhaps less that an hour a day or two, while others might do better if those surplus instructional assets were focused on them.

This need based approach, would require a flexibility in assignments and also a high quality testing regimen.  It would also require Parent and Student buy-in.  Further, it would require a certain degree of Student social maturity.

Such an approach would enhance educational equity.  It would also improve the performance of our students on standardized testing.

It would, however, be the hard way, except for the students.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, February 5, 2021

Exam Schools on the Block?


For John, BLUF:  This is about San Francisco's Lowell Exam High School, named after Lowell, MA, or so I have read.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Linking and Thinking on Education, by Blogger Joanne Jacobs, 4 February 2021.

Here is the lede plus one and a third:

After denaming 44 schools — including Abraham Lincoln High — for historical imperfections, San Francisco school board is fast-tracking a plan to end merit-based admissions for Lowell High School, one of the top high schools in California, reports David Li for NBC News.

The board is on track to approve a resolution to admit students to Lowell (which will be renamed) by lottery, rather than grades and test scores.  Selectivity “perpetuates the culture of white supremacy and racial abuse towards Black and Latinx students,” states the resolution.

The real issue is Chinese supremacy.  Of Lowell’s 2,871 students, 50.6 percent are Asian, mostly Chinese, in a district that’s 33.4 percent Asian, reports Li.

And there is equity for you.  Exam schools allow the smart kids, and also students that come from households that stress academic achievement, to benefit in terms of high school opportunities.  The question is, is it a good thing or a bad thing?  Do those those who go to a former exam school do better?  Or is it that those who might have benefitted from a high performing high school now do not achieve their full potential?

The more subtle question is, does eliminating Exam Schools create equity by denegrating hard work and achievement?  The supplemental question is, does this result in all being worse off, because those entering the economy have failed to achieve their full potential?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, January 22, 2021

No Way Out


For John, BLUF:  John, just like that Irish Funderal Director dismissed you as a Yank, the Woke are dismissing you as white.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Black and Latino Trump voters have been accused of suffering from ‘multiracial whiteness’.

From Spiked, by Assistant Editor Fraser Myers, 20 January 2021.

Here is the lede plus two:

One of the more remarkable results of the 2020 election was that Donald Trump increased his support among non-white voters.  Even some of the hardcore Trumpists who stormed the Capitol – whose faces now adorn the FBI’s ‘wanted’ posters – were black and Latino.

Given that Trump is regularly derided as a racist – a white supremacist, even – this demands an explanation.  ‘What are we to make of unmistakably white mob violence that also includes non-white participants?’, asks Cristina Beltrán from New York University in the Washington Post.  She argues that we need to think in terms of ‘multiracial whiteness’.

Whiteness, Beltrán says, is the ‘politics of aggression, exclusion and domination’.  And multiracial whiteness ‘reflects an understanding of whiteness as a political colour and not simply a racial identity’.  It is a ‘discriminatory worldview in which feelings of freedom and belonging are produced through the persecution and dehumanisation of others’.

It seems we are setting the nation up for a contest between Caucasians and all others.  This is complicated by some of the "all others" identifying with the Anglo-Saxon political outlook of the Caucasians.  This is likely to not end well.

One of the things I am not seeing is the articulation of an end state, a final outcome.  It looks like conflict from now until the sun burns out, unless, of course, there is abject surrender of the Caucasians.  However, to whom do they surrender and are there terns being offerred.  For sure I don't see a Grant at Appomatix situation.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, November 13, 2020

Divided Nation


For John, BLUF:  What separates us is our social classes.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The National Review, by Kyle Smith, 12 November 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

James B. Meigs, the former editor of Popular Mechanics who lately has been writing an insightful column about tech for Commentary, is also doing superb work for City Journal. His latest essay carries a title that is useful shorthand for so much of what is going on around us today: “The Chump Effect.” (At the moment the essay appears to be available only for subscribers to the print edition of the quarterly, which is publishing the best long-form journalism from a center-right perspective that I’m aware of. It’s shocking that, in an era when ordinary weeklies sell for eight bucks or so, this high-impact, 128-page journal with no filler, no ads, and no celebrity fluff costs as little as $5 an issue.)

The Chump Effect is Meigs’s clever term for the bipartisan, broadly shared feeling that various systems are rigged in favor of elites, insiders, and favored groups, which leads to a breakdown in societal trust and trust in institutions. If those guys don’t have to play by the rules, we think, why should I? Meigs delves into social-science experiments that show people motivated by the Chump Effect can act irrationally by effectively volunteering to pay a cost in order that others be punished for ignoring norms.

This is another manifestation of the problem with a meriocracy that does not provide space for those in the bottom half of the population, job and income wise  See, for example, the book by Harvard Professor by Michael J. Sandel, The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?.

We have become a divided nation, but it isn't between Republicans and Democrats, but between Classes.  The realization of that division is being more and more apparent, as reflected in President Trump's increased minority votes this November.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, September 28, 2020

Reaching the American Dream


For John, BLUF:  There is no doubt in my mind that some groups have not achieved the American Dream.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Yes, this is from three years ago, but it is still pertinent in this time of COVID-19 Pandemic and Protests in the streets.

From The Boston Globe, by Reporter Akilah Johnson, 11 December 2017.

Here are the two key paragraphs:

The cities were selected because their diversity allowed researchers to disaggregate data among subgroups within broader racial categories.  In Boston, the report said researchers focused on “multigenerational African Americans (referred here as US blacks), Caribbean blacks (including Haitians), Cape Verdeans (both black and white), Puerto Ricans, and Dominicans.”  A total of 403 people were surveyed.

The household median net worth was $247,500 for whites; $8 for US blacks (the lowest of all five cities); $12,000 for Caribbean blacks; $3,020 for Puerto Ricans; and $0 for Dominicans (that’s not a typo either.)  The sample size for Cape Verdeans was too small to calculate net worth, the report said.

These numbers suggest strongly that some groups have failed ot achieve the American Dream.  The why needs to be explored, but the existence of "Red Lining" for decades, is surely one of the factors.  Real estate is how many Americans build up their family wealth.  That option was closed to many, including many Blacks.  That needs to be fixed.  Reversed would be a good word.  While the idea of "Reparations" (for Slavery) does nothing for me, the idea of correcting bad economic conditions has an appeal.  We need to be helping individuals who have been trapped in poverty due to past discriminatory practices.  Not to make them rich, but to put them on the launching pad to success.

First we need the statistics, so we understand the dimensions of the problem.  Then we need Federal Assistance to help those who had been squeezed out to get in, a sort of new GI Bill.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Avoiding Future George Floyds


For John, BLUF:  Decades of Federal Government intervention and we are still miles from solving this problem.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Red State Blog, by Sister Toldjah, 3 June 2020.

Here is the InstaPundit except:

“Now, too many see the protests as the problem.  No, the problem is what forced your fellow citizens to take to the streets, persistent, and poisonous, inequities and injustice.  And please, show me where it says that protesters are supposed to be polite and peaceful.”
And, of course, the InstaPundit Blogger, Mr Ed Driscoll, obliged, by quoting the First Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
So Newscaster Christ Cuomo doesn't really know the First Amendment.  I am not shocked by that.  He seems to be all emotions and little knowledge.

The other place Mr Cuomo falls down is in not acknowledging that this problem of minorities feeling they are not being listened to is decades old and thus falls on his Brother and his Father, with regard to New York State.  Why is he not excoriating his own kith and kin?

The death of Mr George Floyd is an example of a failure of local government.  Not just the police department, which failed to discharge this officer with over a dozen complaints, but also the local States Attorney, who let him slide on a previous complaint.  And she, now Senator Amy Klobuchar, was short-listed for the Democratic Party Vice Presidential nomination.  If she had acted decisively back in the day might we not be here today.

The problems we are facing today, the abuse of civil rights, the lack of trust in government on the part of some groups in these United States, is not for lack of laws.  It is for lack of good law enforcement.  And not just the police.  This includes things like building inspectors and folks enforing zoning codes.  It is about the education of our children and where the sewer lines are being installed.

If we want to fix this we need to elect local leaders who want to make thing fair.  As for legislation, we might consider this tweet:

Jane Coaston  @cjane87 · 21h
1. End qualified immunity.
2. Curtail the power of police unions
And here’s the toughest one:
3. We probably need fewer laws, in general.
The InstaPundit himself, Law Professor Green Reynolds, bumped this, because it is true.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, April 25, 2020

Breaking Bad Cycles


For John, BLUF:  For six decades we have been trying to fix poverty and discrimination by applying social spending.  This seems not to be working.  Thus, we need even more spending or a different approach.  I am for a new approach.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Free from The New York Times, by Opinion Writer David Brooks, 23 April 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

Who is driving inequality in America? You are.  I am.  We are.

Did you read to your kids before bed when they were young?  If you did, you gave them an advantage over kids whose parents were working the evening shift at 7-Eleven. Did you spend extra on tutoring or music lessons?  Since 1996, affluent families have spent almost 300 percent more educating their young while everybody else’s spending has been mostly flat.

Did you marry before having kids and raise your kids in a two-parent home? The children of the well educated are now much more likely to grow up in stable families, and those differences in family structure explain 32 percent of the growth of family income inequality since 1979.

If you did these things, you did nothing wrong.  You invested in your children’s flourishing as any decent parent would.

But here’s the situation:  The information economy rains money on highly trained professionals — doctors, lawyers, corporate managers, engineers and so on.

Daniel Markovits, author of “The Meritocracy Trap,” estimates there are about one million of these workers in America today.  They work really hard, are really productive and earn a lot more.  In the mid-1960s, profits per partner at elite law firms were less than five times a secretary’s salary.  Now, Markovits notes, they are over 40 times.

These professionals invest heavily in their children’s education.  By eighth grade, students from affluent families are four grade levels ahead of students from poor families.  Seventy-two percent of students at the 150 most competitive colleges come from the richest quarter of families, and only 3 percent come from the poorest.

David Brooks has written a fine article, but you can only do so much in 800 words.

He doesn’t mention that Watts has been down for decades.  I remember, around Summer 1965, with my then girlfriend, arriving at my Father's house in Long Beach and being advised to spend the night, since there were riots in Watts.  We did.

Then there are the roles of LBJ (and RMN) and Jim Hayes in breaking up families.  The number one indicator of success in life—are your two natural parents still married to each other.

And, since David Brooks writes for the NYT there is the School Chancellor, Richard A. Carranza, who is looking to quash any “special” advantages for those kids who are doing well.  A theme emerging in NYC Schools is that it is wrong for parents to help kids with homework or give them special enrichment.  I needle our local Lowell School Superintendent, Dr Joel Boyd, about being a friend of Richard Carranza.  They aren’t, but he has met him.

All that said, Winnie the Flu may well result in a significant amount of flight from cities like New York.  For minorities who flee it might mean new opportunities to help their children grow, a la the article.  For others it could mean sifting out the “bright” kids, giving the others more of a chance.

This is where people like Doctor Boyd come into play.  Our School Superintendent is working hard to decentralize, for increased parental involvement, for getting all involved.  My fingers are crossed.  Better school mean better housing prices, which means more inheritance for our children.

Progress means, however, that people assume individual responsibility for their lives.  And better structured government welfare programs, ones with proper incentives, not disincentives.♠

Hat tip to my Brother Lance, who reads The Old Gray Lady.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  I am looking at you, Speaker Pelosi.

Friday, September 13, 2019

Women in the Workplace


For John, BLUF:  The history of the relations of the sexes has been fraught and has includes solutions that have included separations and restrictions.  We need better ways forward or we will end up with very rigid rules for interactions.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Boston Globe, by Ms Katie Johnston, 3 September 2019,.

Here is the lede plus one:

In the two years since the #MeToo movement took off, igniting a firestorm over sexual harassment in the workplace, another form of less incendiary but more insidious gender-based harassment has been building quietly.

Women say they are being subjected to sexism far more than they used to be, according to a new study out of the University of Colorado Boulder Leeds School of Business — even as they report less overt harassment, such as sexual coercion (“sleep with me and you’ll get a promotion”) and unwanted sexual attention (ogling or fondling).

Women are facing a “massive increase in hostility,” said Stefanie K. Johnson, the business professor who coauthored the study.&nsp; Research shows that people in power feel threatened when other groups rise up, as women have during the #MeToo era, and that men believe their status declines when women’s rises, which could cause some men to lash out.

“It’s not that the need to subjugate women goes away, I just think it takes a different form,” Johnson said.  “Rather than make sexual comments about women, men who are prone to sexually harass will just accuse women of being incompetent.”

The key is understanding what is happening.  Are men, on average, just hostile to women in the workplace, do they perceive that women are inferior or are mores just different, misunderstood or incompatible?  For sure, our current laws and culture call for men to give women an even break, and visa-versa.  At the same time, concern about women using the tools for fighting sexual harassment to achieve other ends causes men to act defensively.  We know, from history and our own experience, that change engenders hostility.  Mutual respect and trust should mitigate the hostility.

We need a truce, but that requires good faith on all sides.

Should we all be frank about our concerns or should we just muddle through, showing our distrust in other ways?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Sunday, September 1, 2019

Equal Justice For All?


For John, BLUF:  Are we creating an "under class" who are treated by a different set of rules, maybe Deplorables who are unredeemable?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

“Equal justice under the law” is not supposed to be an aspiration or a quaint slogan. It is supposed to be a guarantee.

From National Review, by Author Andrew C McCarthy, 24 August 2019.

Here is the lede plus one:

The date of a meeting, that’s all the lie was about. George Papadopoulos claimed that a meeting he’d had with the mysterious Maltese professor, Josef Mifsud, happened slightly before the green-as-grass 28-year-old was recruited into the Trump campaign.  In reality, it was slightly after.

It wasn’t a very important lie.  It was of no consequence to the FBI or the special counsel’s investigation. Papadopoulos was such an afterthought that the Bureau did not bother to interview him until late January 2017 — about 10 months after he met Mifsud.  By the time Papadopoulos was charged, the Trump–Russia investigation had been ongoing for well over a year — it was already clear that there was no conspiracy.

Here is how the article ends:
For about ten days, I’ve had a new book out on Russiagate, called Ball of Collusion.  I’ve gotten to do lots of speeches and interviews.  Most interesting are the ones when members of the audience ask questions.  Without fail, they home in on the thing I least like to talk about:  What is going to happen to government officials who are suspected of abusing their powers and misleading such bodies as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court?  A name that reliably comes up is Andy McCabe.  People who have followed the story know the IG referred him to the Justice Department for a possible false-statements prosecution.  They know other aspects of McCabe’s conduct are still under investigation.

I hate this topic because I am not one to cheerlead for comeuppance against law-enforcement people.  I know how hard their jobs are, how readily errors can be made because one often has to act on imperfect information; because there is a natural zeal to catch bad guys that can easily become overzealousness.  I have no problem analyzing their judgment calls — mine got analyzed plenty, and we all make our share of mistakes.  But I am hard-wired not to presume bad motive.

So I tell people what they don’t want to hear:  We don’t know all the salient facts; we should wait for the imminent reports of investigations being conducted by Horowitz and John Durham (the Connecticut U.S. attorney tasked by AG Bill Barr to probe Russiagate); and we should disabuse ourselves of the notion that errors in judgment and abuses of discretion, even egregious ones, necessarily entail criminal-law violations.  It is much more important to have a factual accounting of what happened, and to take whatever curative measures are apt to prevent bad things from happening again.

Suffice it to say, this does not get a warm reception.

There is a great deal of anger out there.  People see the kid-gloves approach to the Clinton-emails investigation, and they can’t square it with the aggression of the Trump–Russia probe.  They see the laws contorted to let Mrs. Clinton slide, while the screws get put to Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort over the Logan Act and the Foreign Agent Registration Act – statutes the Justice Department almost never invokes.

They see the false-statements investigations of Andy McCabe and George Papadopoulos and think, “Hey, wait a second . . .”

“Equal justice under the law” is not supposed to be an aspiration or a quaint slogan. It is supposed to be a guarantee.

If I don't have equal rights, equal access to justice, am I really part of the social compact, really an equal citizen?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, August 17, 2019

Out in the Cold


For John, BLUF:  Equality is important, but it can not be achieved by herding various majorities into corners and stripping them of their own right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

The municipality of Anchorage goes after the Hope Center for acting in the best interests of the women it serves.

From National Review, by Ms Madeleine Kearny, 16 August 2019.

Long story short, a man identifying as a woman wants access to a woman's shelter, in January, in Anchorage, Alaska.  Obviously we need more Trans shelter space, but that doesn't mean we should expose cis-women to traumas from having to sleep in the same room as a person with male genitalia.  We need alternatives.

The Anchorage Equal Rights Commission (AERC) seems clueless.  And apparently lacks the resources to help fix the problems at the Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, August 16, 2019

Women's Soccer


For John, BLUF:  Equal pay for equal performance seems fair.  In the case of Soccer it is the gate.  And, Ms Rapinoe seems like a jerk.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

“It’s quite simple from our perspective,” her teammate Christen Press said during a Thursday interview on “Good Morning America.”

From Huffington Post, by Reporter Alanna Vagianos, 15 August 2019.

Here is the lede plus two:

The members of the U.S. women’s national soccer team know their worth ― and they’re not backing down from the ongoing equal pay fight against the U.S. Soccer Federation.

“We won’t accept anything less than equal pay,” star midfielder Megan Rapinoe said Thursday during an interview on “Good Morning America.”  “We show up for a game.  If we win the game, if we lose the game, if we tie the game, we want to be paid equally, period.”

The USWNT filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation earlier this year and entered into mediation just before the World Cup started in France in June.  The women’s team has fought long and hard to get paid the same as their male counterparts, who win fewer games but get paid roughly $30,000 more per player.

As Blogger Steven Green said, at InstaPundit, "THEN SHE’D BETTER FIGURE OUT A WAY TO GENERATE EQUAL REVENUES."

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Sunday, August 11, 2019

"Our" Women's Soccer Team


For John, BLUF:  Down in my list of draft posts was this on the US Women’s Soccer Team, with a reference to Quarterback Colin Kaepernick.  Today CBS Reported this:  'President Trump on Colin Kaepernick getting another NFL opportunity:  "I'd like to see it. Frankly, I'd love see Kaepernick come in if he's good enough.'".  Nothing to see here; just move along.



Saturday, March 30, 2019

Who is Committing Sexual Assault?


For John, BLUF:  Sexual equality seems to include equality amongst perps.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

New CDC report reveals troubling equality when it comes to sexual assault rates.

This is a USA Today article by Law Professor Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Published 6:55 p.m. ET Sept. 22, 2014.

Yes, there is former Vice President Joe Biden, attracting attention to himself, but sexual misbehavior is not just a male thing.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

The Draft For All


For John, BLUF:  It is time to have this discussion.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From USA Today, by Mr Gregory Korte, 24 February 2019.

Here is the lede plus two:

A federal judge in Texas has declared that the all-male military draft is unconstitutional, ruling that "the time has passed" for a debate on whether women belong in the military.

The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld the draft in 1981.  In Rostker v. Goldberg, the court ruled that the male-only draft was "fully justified" because women were ineligible for combat roles.

But U.S. District Judge Gray Miller ruled late Friday that while historical restrictions on women serving in combat "may have justified past discrimination," men and women are now equally able to fight.  In 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions for women in military service.

The issue not addressed is that of pregnancy.  In time of war it is important to not allow the continued growth of the population to fall off.  Bearing children is a risky enterprise and require a long term investment.  As we bring women into the draft (conscription) we must also make allowance for that duty that only women can fulfill, giving birth.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Equality For All


For John, BLUF:  When running a Star Chamber it is best the defendent be as ignorant as possible.  Nothing to see here; just move along.



From InstaPundit, by Mr Robert Shibley, 30/1622 January 2019.

Here is the Blog Post:

HIGHER ED’S LOBBYING ARM OPPOSES TELLING STUDENTS THEY’RE PRESUMED INNOCENT:  In responding to proposed Title IX regulatory changes, the American Council on Education says that while some colleges are OK with saying students should be presumed innocent, “other colleges would be uncomfortable with including a federally mandated statement in the institution’s notice indicating a ‘presumption’ in favor of one party… We recommend that the Department remove this requirement.”  They actually say doing so might “cause confusion.”  Give me a break.
This is the kind of reason Western Civilization is no longer taught in high school or college.  Heck, the students might be exposed to Anglo-Saxon legal principles like due process or innocent until proven guilty.

That would set the Progressive agenda back.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Equal Rights and Responsibilities


For John, BLUF:  Women registering for the Draft is a step forward for equal rights.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




My answer:

YES!

From USA Today, by Reporter Gregory Korte, 23 January 2019.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff