The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.
Showing posts with label Civics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civics. Show all posts

Monday, November 8, 2021

Call to Action


For John, BLUFThis talks to a problem which is often misidentified, but a problem that needs to be fixed nevertheless—voter turnout.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The [Lowell] Sun, by Ms Katharine C. Gorka, 5 November 2021.

Here is the lede plus one:

As the election results in Virginia and elsewhere demon-strate, many parents are upset with how American history and civics are being taught in schools.  And it’s hard to blame them.

Some feel we are tearing down our nation’s past.  Others believe we are not doing enough to tell the history of all Americans, particularly those in communities that have long been marginalized.  The good news is that discussions are taking place in school districts nationwide over what we should teach our children.  The bad news is that those debates may not resolved anytime soon.

But parents can take an active role in ensuring their children receive the education they want them to have.

Yes, the problem Lowell faced a while back with the lawsuit about how we elect local officials was really about a failure of the School Committee to ensure we teach civics.

Lowell has a new system for electing local officials.  Now we have to knucle down and make it work.  That means serious civics instruction.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, October 30, 2021

Education For Citizenship


For John, BLUFThe autahor, a University President, has written off K-12 Public Educztion as a place where future voters learn about democracy.  That is sad.  There was a day when most people didn't go to college and public schools had the responsibility of Civics education, and stepped up.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Institutions of higher education have remained, at best, bit players in the project of educating the citizenry.

From The Atlantic, by Johns Hopkins University President Ronald J. Daniels, 3 October 2021.

Here is the lede plus three:

was born in canada, and my sense of national identity, like that of many Canadians, was formed in direct relation—perhaps in opposition—to the great colossus to the south. We were a country that aspired not to the lofty abstractions of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” but to the more prosaic benefits of “peace, order, and good government.”  I have always been proud of Canada’s basic values—but I have also envied the grandeur of the American experiment, even in the face of its shortcomings and contradictions.

When I first came to the United States, in the mid-2000s, I expected, perhaps naively, that this country would be a bastion of civic learning.  Surely the stewards of the world’s first modern democracy would understand the need to cultivate an understanding of both its majesty and its mechanics—the Enlightenment ideas that animate it and the institutions that make it work.  But when my children enrolled in high school in Philadelphia, they received only a weak introduction to any of this.  That modest exposure, however, was far more elaborate than what many other children across the country receive.  Two years ago, during a seminar at Johns Hopkins University, I asked my students if any of them had learned about core democratic ideas and institutions in high school.  Only a smattering of hands went up—and those few were at half-mast.

The dearth of civic education is corrosive. According to an Associated Press–GfK survey, from 1984 to 2014, the share of American adults who said that staying informed about current affairs and public issues was “not an obligation that a citizen owes to the country” more than tripled, from 6 to 20 percent.  Over roughly the same period, according to Cambridge University’s Centre for the Future of Democracy, dissatisfaction with democracy among young people has risen precipitously, particularly in the United States.

For decades, elementary and secondary schools have borne the responsibility of educating about citizenship.  But in an era when funding is limited and partisans on all sides are quick to detect the merest whiff of agendas they dislike, civics and social-studies classes are among the first to shrivel.  A majority of principals and other school leaders surveyed in 2018 by Education Week believed that students were not getting enough civics education.  Often, there is little they can do.

Another sign of the times.  Back in the day, when I was in Eighth Grade, one of our year long classes was called Core.  It was about being a grownup and grownup responsibilities.  For example, we had to research and do a report on three different future careers.  (I did Aeronautical Engineer and Army Armor Officer and one other, which I can't remember.)  We studied the US Constitution.  We wrote a town charter for a mythical town in which we lived  We learned civics.

Today, apparently not so much.

Who fixes this?  Our School Superintendent?  Our School Committee?  The General Court?  The Troika of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden?

I think it is on the voters of Lowell.  Vote wisely on Tuesday, but vote, so those elected know you are paying at least a little attention.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Poof


For John, BLUFSome of us, outside the world of education, worry that civics is not being taught in our schools, or not being taught well.  Sadly.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The New Neo, 20 December 2019.

Here is the lede plus four:

My goodness:

It might be difficult to believe after weeks of talk about impeachment that there are people who still don’t understand the process, but on Twitter last night, “#ByeTrump” was trending because many believed that the House vote on impeachment meant that President Donald Trump was now removed.

Some had to be schooled then today when they found out to their surprise that lo and behold, Trump was still president and that no, being impeached is not the same thing as removal

Although shocking, it’s not surprising.  We’ve known for quite some time that the teaching of civics is nothing like what it used to be, and that many people schooled in the US grow up ignorant of even the basics of the way our government works.  So, many people who seem to be politically active and involved – involved enough to tweet about politics on Twitter, anyway – appear to have thought that impeachment itself would remove Trump from office.

This isn’t just about Trump.  Apparently, these people are so ignorant of the entire picture of how our government is designed that they think the Founders set things up so that one body of our legislature can remove a president by a simple majority vote. Poof, you’re gone!

Funny, but sad.  Democrats.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, November 26, 2018

Civics Education


For John, BLUFThis is a good thing.  But how much can you fit into a twelve pound bag?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Hot Air, by Ms Karen Townsend, 23 November 2018.

Here is the lede plus one:

Hallelujah! The governor of Massachusetts signed a bill into law that encourages civics education in public schools. Acting just two days after the mid-term elections, he was able to get bi-partisan support, though I would argue that Democrats want civics education for different reasons than Republicans.  Let’s hope that the push for a re-birth of civics education continues in all of the states.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, October 23, 2015

The REAL Issue WRT Benghazi


For John, BLUFMaybe they stopped teaching Civics before Ms Clinton entered High School.  Nothing to see here; just move along.



From The New York Post we have the Editorial Board talking about "Hillary’s horrid Benghazi-hearing howlers".

If you believe, as I do, that the reason our Ambassador was there was to meet with people who have salvaged the remains of an alien space ship, the secrecy makes sense.

However, the real crime regarding the Benghazi imbroglio is that the US Federal Government:

  1. Tried to use a private videographer as a scapegoat for the attack (and did so for several days, even though the truth was known from the beginning).
  2. Tried to use the scapegoated videographer as a way to "signal" to Muslim Governments, and Muslims, that while we have Freedom of Speech, it will not be allowed to extend to comments on The Prophet Muhammad.
  3. And, worst of all, used its assets to bring attention to the videographer, and perhaps encourage local California authorities to arrest him on a parole violation and put him in jail for six more months.  For Justice?  No, to support the signaling being done by the Department of State over disparaging videos, cartoons or comments on The Prophet Muhammad.
To give us some perspective, what happened to American artist and photographer Andres Serrano for his infamous Piss Christ?  Perhaps you don't see the two as basically the same.  Shame on you.

Here is the Department of State Mission:

Advance freedom for the benefit of the American people and the international community by helping to build and sustain a more democratic, secure, and prosperous world composed of well-governed states that respond to the needs of their people, reduce widespread poverty, and act responsibly within the international system.
With regard to Benghazi, they ignored the mission and went with damage control.  Sad.  I wonder how Ambassador Chris Stevens would have felt about it?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

  I guess that passes for alliteration.