Now comes Mark Steyn with this group of words, "Climategate/ Climaquiddick scandal". The comment is quickly absorbed and that forbidden topic is now out in the open.
The article itself talks to the question of the value of peer reviews, especially in light of indications from the CRU EMails that the "climate change" folks were doing all they could to suppress opposition—junk science, I am sure they would say.
Of course, the question is, who is my "peer" and do I accept this person or not?
Or, as Mark Steyn says in his column
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” wondered Juvenal: Who watches the watchmen?In this case we could be talking about people stealing billions of dollars and continuing the impoverishment of hundreds of millions of people. Or saving hundreds of millions of lives.
Regards — Cliff
PS: The other fun word out of the article is "ecopalypse".