For John, BLUF: A too quick move for punishment can leave justice in the dust. Nothing to see here; just move along.
An OpEd by Mr Bret Stephens, 8 September 2017, in The Old gray Lady.
Here are two paragraphs from well down in the OpED:
The travesties of justice carried out under the new Title IX guidelines have been the subject of some excellent books and superb journalism, none better than Emily Yoffe’s in The Atlantic. And yet the response of the progressive left has been indifferent or worse."Hackneyed" due process? Ms Siskind is ignorant. Due process is what keeps the law on the rails. And the Government, with its vast powers.On Thursday, the social activist Amy Siskind tweeted that the conservative writer David French should “ST🁢U with your hackneyed due process talking point” after the latter pointed out that “campus kangaroo courts violate fundamental rights.”♠
In the 1966 play A Man for All Seasons, the case is well put by Sir Thomas, talking to his Son-in-Law, Mr William Roper, MP.
William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!This is the kind of understand totally lacking on the part of the Antifa movement, and by Progressives who adhere to them and their approach to freedom.Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff
♠ "Hackneyed" is a term used when legitimate arguments are not working. It is a weak response.
No comments:
Post a Comment