For John, BLUF: The Democrats seem to still be concerned by the possibility President Trump might run again in 2024. They are prepared to go to strange extremes to prevent such a thing. Nothing to see here; just move along.
Thiss bill has been introduceed by Repreentative David N. Cicilline, Demoocrat of Rhode Island. It is based upoon Representative Cicilline's understanding of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which states:
‘‘No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.’’.I found this little jewel in Conservative Review, in an article titled: "House Democrats Introduce Legislation That Would Bar Trump From The Presidency". This Bill has picked up 40 co-sponsors, includiing Representative James P. McGovern, Democrat of Masssachusetts Disterict 2. The good news is that our Representative, Ms Lori Trahan, has not signed onto this legislation.♠
This proposed legislation, based on a Post-Civil War Amendment to the Constitution (14th Amwndweent), seems deficient to me. It is an attempt to bar Former president Trump from serving as President again. Or serving in any other office.
The problem is, President Trump has not yet been convicted of any crimes under the 14th Amendment. Almost two years after the 6 January 2021 riot on Capitol Hill he has not yet even been indicted for any crime. As an aside, if it was an insurrection on the part of President Trump isn't it the height of incompetence that the legal institutions have not yet done anything to bring him to "justice"? Are we looking at one more self-indictment on the part of the Biden-Harris Administration?
Then there is the American voter. While the media is moving to minimize the importance of the Twitter suppression of the original New York Post article on the Hunter Biden Laptop, the American People are giving it credibility.. Breitbart told us on 12 December of this year: "Poll: 71% Say Accurate Reporting of Hunter’s Laptop Could Have Altered 2020 Election". That is could vs would, but it is still an indication that the voting public is not to be toyed with for perverse political gain.
I think the US House of Representatives needs to let this piece of legislation die with the end of the 117th Congress.
Regards — Cliff
♠ Yes, I did take the time to Call Representative Trahan's Lowell Office and say that I thought this was a bad piece of legislation.
No comments:
Post a Comment