For John, BLUF: What are Democrats talking about when they talk about an insurrection on 6 January 2020. Nothing to see here; just move along.
From , by Blogged Charles Glasser, 7 Januaary 2025, 10:02 am.
Here is the lede plus two:
LOOKING BACK (A bit long): I’ve studied an awful lot of history in getting a degree in political philosphy, and that through the very left-leaning CUNY school system. On reflection, it has become clear to me that anyone who uses the word “insurrection” descibing the idiocy of Jan. 6 has no idea what they are talking about.Sums up my view on the issue. For example, who went to the studios of NPR to take control of that source of information to the Citizens?Was it a riot? Yep. Were many of the particpants dopes? Yep. But read how John Adams, Robespierre, Lenin, Mao and Castro pulled off genuine “revolutions” and you’ll see that mobbing a capitol building isn’t even close. You need to control central information and transportation hubs, get the army to back you, and bring weapons.
None of that happened on J6. If you use the word “insurrection” to describe J6: You have zero credibility.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff