The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.
Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Being Safe between Home and School


For John, BLUF:  Young men and women are reacting to confronting criminals on the streets.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From @Rightanglenews, by Right Angle News Network, 25 Aug 2025, 9:34 AM.

Here is the Text to accompny the video in the text:

BREAKING - Police have arrested and charged a 14-year-old girl after she was forced to brandish a knife to defend herself and her friend against a migrant who attempted to assault her near St Ann’s Lane in Dundee, Scotland.
It is a sign that the local Government is fialing the Citizens when young teen girls are going around armed to protect themselves from predators.

It is no surprise that Member of Parliament Nigel Fargage's UK Independence Partyparty is getting attention in Great Britian.  Labour and the Conservative Parties should pay attention

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

v

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Election Interference


For John, BLUF:  The Democrats, in 2024, got election help from overseas, including from the British Labour Party.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From 𝕏, by Mr Jim Ferguson, 14 January 2025, 6:21 AM.

Here is the Tweet:

BREAKING: Labour’s Head of Operations, Sophia Patel, has deleted her LinkedIn profile and locked her Twitter after explosive allegations surfaced that she organized 100 Labour staffers to meddle in the 2024 US election—allegedly to prevent Donald Trump’s reelection.

Here’s where it gets serious: thanks to extradition laws signed by former Labour PM Tony Blair, it’s now easier for UK citizens to be sent to the US to face charges.

Patel could potentially be charged with:
1️⃣ Election Interference
2️⃣ Failure to Register as a Foreign Agent (FARA)
3️⃣ Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the US
4️⃣ Cybercrime or Unauthorized Access
5️⃣ Transporting Funds for Unlawful Purposes
6️⃣ Interstate Travel to Aid Unlawful Activities

If convicted, these charges carry severe penalties, including significant fines and prison time.  Is Patel now terrified she’ll be extradited and prosecuted under US law?  This could explode into a major international scandal with far-reaching implications.

I don't see this as a big deal.  Considering the number of elections our Government has meddled in, that someone outside our nation should play in ours is not a susrprise.  That is not to say that we shouldn't take steps to limit outside intererence.

On the other hand, this move was a little tone deaf on the part of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Labour Party.  Maybe they thought Candidate Kamala Harris would win, but it was a bet with a big down side.

I say grant Ms Patel a pardon and use it to heckle Mr Starmer.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, October 12, 2024

You Still Have to Govern

Blog Template.
Winning an election is only the first step.  Then you must govern.  It appears the aparliamentary Labour Party og Greak abritain was not prepared for this second step.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

NO PLANS FOR CELEBRATION OF DISASTROUS FIRST 100 DAYS OF LABOUR

From Order Order, by Guido Fawkes, 11 October 2024, 12:26.

Here is the lede plus one:

No 10 has just confirmed at today’s Lobby briefing that there are no plans to hold a celebration to mark 100 days of government.  Starmer will be holed up in Downing Street this weekend working on his “reset”…
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has run into a number of issues since moving to No 10 Downing Street.  Among them is a major popularity crash.  Not that the Tories (Conservatives) have managed to get their act together .

The best of British Luck to our cousins across the pond.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, October 16, 2023

Bad Political Leadership


For John, BLUF:  This is about British politicianJeremy Corbyn, but also about how anti-semitism is popular on the left.  Our political leaders on the Progressive side have forgotten the liberal attribues of free speech and tolerance.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

The speech Corbyn read at the pro-Palestine demonstration mourned those murdered in the Negev desert, but did not mention the party responsible for the brutal attack.

From Jerusalem Post, by Danielle Greyman Kennard, 16 October 2023, 01:51.

Here is the lede plus one:

Former leader of the United Kingdom’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, has become increasingly vocal about Israel’s actions against the Hamas terrorist organization, and the casualties stemming from those actions.

Corbyn, who has refused to condemn Hamas, wrote on X on October 12 that “We should condemn the of all civilian life, no matter who does it. Why can't our politicians uphold this basic moral principle, and defend international law universally and equally? How many innocent Palestinian lives should be erased in the name of self-defence?”

My wife and I were just discussing the amount of anti-semitism that has been on display for the last week.  The idea that The Jews are responsible for everything is both old and wrong.  In the case of the Hamas attack that killed hundreds of civilian men, women and children, the cries of the deranged (or undereducated) notwithstanding, it is not Israel's fault.  Ffurther, their cries of "the river to the sea" has a strong whiff of genocide in it.

In Gaza we have a population that has no concept of a lemon aide stand.  Yes, they have been given lemons.  Why have they not been making lemon aide?  Because after making war on the new State of Israel in 1948 they decamped and now want their old property back.  They are still living in 1948, when they tried to smother the new Israel in the crib and failed.  What they could not achieve by more conventional armed conflict they are now trying to achieve by guerrilla warfare, using terror.

Professor Glenn Reynolds concludes:  "The distinction between Corby and Oswald Mosleyd is pretty much gone.  If it ever existed."♠ 

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  Mr Mosely was a notorious Fascist in England in the 1920s and 1930s.  He passed on in 1980.

Friday, December 10, 2021

Julian Assange Coming to America


For John, BLUF:  This is a saga that has gone on for too long a time.  It should have been ended under the last administration.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Press freedom groups have warned Assange's prosecution is a grave threat.  The Biden DOJ ignored them, and today won a major victory toward permanently silencing the pioneering transparency activist.

From Greenwald Substack, by Reporter Glenn Greenwald, 19 December 2021.

Here is the lede plus one:

In a London courtroom on Friday morning, Julian Assange suffered a devastating blow to his quest for freedom.  A two-judge appellate panel of the United Kingdom's High Court ruled that the U.S.'s request to extradite Assange to the U.S. to stand trial on espionage charges is legally valid.

As a result, that extradition request will now be sent to British Home Secretary Prita Patel, who technically must approve all extradition requests but, given the U.K. Government's long-time subservience to the U.S. security state, is all but certain to rubber-stamp it.  Assange's representatives, including his fiancee Stella Morris, have vowed to appeal the ruling, but today's victory for the U.S. means that Assange's freedom, if it ever comes, is further away than ever: not months but years even under the best of circumstances.

This is not a good turn for press freedom, either in the UK or the US.  I wonder what they are afraid of.

As an aside, I did think that Mr Greenwald was a bit snarky about the UK being subservient to the US in the area of national security.  However, the issue of press freedom should be paramount for both nations.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, April 13, 2021

It Is Never Enough


For John, BLUF:  How much diversity is enough diversity, and when will we begin to explore all the dimensions of diversity?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

  • Miranda Wayland said the hit BBC crime drama was only superficially diverse
  • Bosses are now looking to portray minority groups in a more convincing way
  • BBC will spend £100m of content budget on diverse programming over 3 years

From The Daily Mail. by Reporter Tom Pyman, 13 April 2021, 20:58 EDT.

Here is the lede plus two:

The BBC's diversity chief has claimed Idris Elba's TV detective Luther 'isn't black enough to be real' because 'he doesn't have any black friends and doesn't eat any Caribbean food'.

Miranda Wayland said the hit crime drama, which won plaudits for having a strong, black lead character, was only superficially diverse and that corporation bosses are now looking to portray minority groups in a more convincing and rounded way.

Elba, who first made his name across the Atlantic starring as Stringer Bell in The Wire, cemented his status as a worldwide star by picking up a Golden Globe, among other gongs, for his depiction of the obsessive John Luther between 2010 and 2019.

From Wikipedia, "Luther is a British psychological crime drama television series starring Idris Elba as DCI John Luther…."

We watched Luther! and we enjoyed it.  Truth be told, I also like Hinterland but may be the only one, except for Senator Joe Biden.

This seems over the top.  I don't eat Irish food.  Does this obviate my heritage?  As Undertaker John McDonough says, "The food is why we left Ireland."

Hat tip to Fox News Commentator Tucker Carlson.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, December 28, 2020

The Brits and the EU Cut a Deal


For John, BLUF:  The report is an overly long Brexit agreement with the European Union, but the guarantees of sovereignty are in there.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Spectator, by barrister Steven Barrett, 27 December 2020.

Here is the lede plus three:

The new UK/EU Treaty is needlessly long and turgid in its prose:  this document was not drafted by people who think the law should be understood by all.  Close inspection of the small print reveals that none of the details undermine sovereignty.  It has been restored and the UK has the power to control its own laws.

To understand what’s happened, consider the last two big treaties.  Under the Maastricht Treaty the EU’s ability to control UK law was extended on what came before but was confined to specific areas only. That was called 'spheres of competence'.  The 2007 Lisbon Treaty vastly expanded the EU’s power and the idea of restricting EU writ to areas of its competence fell away.  Marina Wheeler has written in The Spectator about the Lisbon power grab and its huge implications:  it’s worth re-reading for a sense of what Lord Frost was up against.  And what he has successfully uprooted.

The Brexit deal takes things back to where they were before Maastricht.  The EU is limited now in any meddling to very specific areas indeed.  It ends the oddity where because circa seven per cent of UK business trade with the EU, 100 per cent have their laws made by the EU (although that is a bit more blurred in supply chains).

In the small print of the deal, the remnants of failed EU attempts to fetter British sovereignty can be seen.  Consider the ‘precautionary approach’.  This slides in via footnote 49, disguising itself in footnote 52.  But by the time it gets in as actual law (article 1.2 page 179) it’s clear that it has lost the battle; its words have no force. British negotiators seem to have seen to that.  As long as one side has a plausible scientific argument, it may do as it likes.  There are other failed EU power grabs in the text, none carrying force.

This is good news.  I am happy to see Britain free from the Brussels Bureaucracy that runs the European Union.  Power to the People.

Maybe now the Brits will be more sympathetic to the Anglo-Phone People in Cameroon.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

The COVID Kabuki Dance


For John, BLUF:  I continue to think that there is still a lot to learn about COVID-19 and much of what we do to protect ourselves is a Kabuki Dance.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From the Behind the Black Blog, by Mr Robert Zimmerman, 22 November 2020.

Here is the lede plus two:

A new study published in the journal Nature has found that people who are either asymptomatic or undergoing a secondary illness of COVID-19 are simply not infectious, and don’t give the virus to others.

In other words, it appears that the only time people can infect others is when they have the virus for the first time, and only when they are symptomatic.  Lock downs and the use of masks by the healthy accomplish nothing.  All you need to do is quarantine the symptomatic patient, as human societies have been doing for centuries and centuries.

To once again emphasize this point, wearing masks if you are healthy and not sick protects no one.  Social distancing if you are not sick protects no one.  Shutting down businesses, such as reducing capacities at restaurants so they can’t make a profit, protects no one.  Curfews protect no one.

I look forward to clarity on this issue.  I got the first article from Science Fiction Author Sarah Hoyt (Via InstaPundit), who also sent along this item, from The Critic, a UK web site, "The Covid Physician’s true coronavirus timeline:  'My experience is no one but the government and mainstream media are sharing apocalyptic Covid-19 death experiences with me'”.

I am still dancing the dance, because one never knows which steps are of high value.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, October 31, 2020

Helping the Poor


For John, BLUF:  Notwithstnding the beliefs of AOC, et al, there is no free lunch, or as The Little Flower, upon becoming Mayor of New York, said:  "È finita la cuccagna!".  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here are the bullet points:

  • Many employers simply can't afford another hike in the Living Wage
  • Most minimum wage workers are not in poverty - so help should be targeted on those who are
  • Bankers and footballers should pay for the minimum wage hike, not struggling small businesses

From CapX, by Mr Sam Dumitriu, 30 October 2020.

Here is the lede plus two:

It will have escaped no one’s notice that the UK is in an employment crisis.  In the OBR’s Central Estimate, unemployment is set to rise to record levels, surpassing even the peak of joblessness in the 80s.  At the same time, social distancing measures have hit productivity hard.  It’s not their fault, but a waiter is simply less productive in a world with the Rule of Six, Tier Two measures, and general customer unease about eating out.

To his credit, Rishi Sunak has been willing to act to protect jobs.  At first with furlough and now with the recently expanded Job Support Scheme.  But both policies are premised on employees working fewer hours.  They’re badly suited to, for example, pubs who need more staff on call due to the switch to table service but are still seeing fewer customers through the door.

Labour markets, like all markets, are governed by the laws of supply and demand.  When workers become less productive, demand for them falls.  The typical consequence of a drop in demand is a fall in price.  Think of how you can pick up bargains in the January sales when consumer demand inevitably slumps.  But this isn’t possible in all markets.  In labour markets, wages are sticky.  Unlike petrol prices, wages don’t change daily in response to shifts in demand.  Employers are hesitant to slash wages as it can damage employee morale and attract bad press.  On top of that, bosses are legally prevented from employing any worker for less than the National Living Wage.

The article is worth the read.  And the source is an alternative worth sampling.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Minority Tyranny


For John, BLUF:  We have to learn to have differences without those differences developing into contempt.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Christian Headlines, by Reporter Will Maule, 25 February 2020.

Here is the lede plus two:

A British politician has drawn criticism for suggesting that babies are born without any specific biological gender.

The comments were made by Labour Party member Dawn Butler during a discussion on ITV’s Good Morning Britain show.  Butler was discussing the Labour Party’s progressive view on gender ideology after a group associated with the left-wing opposition party proposed a controversial pledge to protect trans rights.

Good Morning Britain Host Richard Madely accused the Labour Party of stifling free speech after two Labour Party candidates hoping to become the next party leader backed a trans group’s call to expel anyone in the party who questions their interpretation of transgender ideology.

Expel anyone who doesn't hew to the party line?  This is like Senator Bernie Sanders saying being pro-choice is an essential part of being a Democrat.♠

Here is my favorite part:

“When a child is born, they are identified and observed in a particular sex aren’t they?” Madely asked.  Butler responded:  “A child is born without sex, a child is formed without sex in the beginning.”
Does this rise to the level of science denial?.  It would seem too, although I guess a case could be made for external manifestations and chromosome tests as being superficial indicators. I do not wish to be classified as one who denies that people feel they are mis-gendered.  I have been aware of the wish on the part of some to change genders since Christine Jorganson went to Denmark.  It is a free country and people should be allowed to present as they wish.

That doesn't mean that they should take their unique issues into the military or that we should allow interventions to change gender for those not yet adults.  Changing gender is an adult decision, like drinking, smoking or owning guns.

But, the big thing is that we don't need to be having litmus tests for party membership.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  Maybe it is time for a Third Party.  Not every person who is wholly or partially pro-life wants to be a Republican.  Is there space for them on the American political landscape?

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

National Health Service to Teach Manners


For John, BLUF:  Once the bureaucrats have established they can ration service based on behavior, they won't sto p  The best of British luck to us.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

The NHS will soon bar discriminatory patients from non-critical care - powers that currently only cover aggression or violence.

From Sky News by News Reporter Ms Clare Sibthorpe, 18 February 2020.

Here is the lede plus four:

Sexist and racist patients could be barred from non-emergency care at NHS trusts, under new rules to be enforced from April.

Currently, staff can refuse to treat non-critical patients who are verbally aggressive or physically violent towards them.

But these protections will extend to any harassment, bullying or discrimination, including homophobic, sexist or racist remarks.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock wrote to all NHS staff on Tuesday to announce stronger measures to investigate abuse and harassment towards staff, saying "no act of violence or abuse is minor".

"Being assaulted or abused is not part of the job," he said.

I like it.  Take people when they are highly stressed and hold them to their best tea party behavior.  That will work out well.

I wonder if Mr Matt Hancock has re-education camps in mind?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Discrimination in High Ed


For John, BLUF:  Back in the early 1970s, when the Air Force was sending all of us to "Social Actions" classes, some viewed them as teaching Air Force members how to discriminate.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The College Fix, by the College Fix Staff, 12 JANUARY 2020.

Here is the lede plus three (Note that this is the UK, but I expect it transfers to the US):

A professor of education and social justice at the University of Birmingham says college trainings designed to help minorities advance are ineffective, and may even bolster “white privilege.”

Kalwant Bhopal examined 30 interviews of those who attended programs designed to support BMEs (Black Ethnic Minorities), and found that many believed “structural inequalities” were not sufficiently addressed.

According to Times Higher Education, at present only 80 of the United Kingdom’s 14,000-plus professors are black.

Bhopal, who published her findings in the British Educational Research Journal, said diversity/inclusion programs “benefit higher education institutions rather than contributing to a commitment to inclusion, equity and creating a diverse workforce.”  They also “perpetuate and reinforce white privilege.”

Frankly on this day after the Martin Luther King, Jr, Holiday, it might be time to reflect on if it is time to make generous assumptions about how most of us have a more mature view of race relations.  And to accept that some people just never grow up and thus are abusive of all the people they meet.  At the same time, too much banging of the kettle can become irritating.

Perhaps yesterday's Second Amendment demonstration in Virginia's Capitol, Richmond, can serve of an example of everyone pulling together for the same goal.  Notwithstanding some in the Press billing the demonstration as a "White Supremacist" meeting, it was people of all races and orientations advocating against what they see as proposed new laws that are not only self-defeating, but unconstitutional.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

Who Compares with the Late Quds Force Commander Qassim Soleimani


For John, BLUF:  The targeted killing of Quds Force Commander Qassim Soleimani has caused Democrats to become excited about the actions of President Trump in defense of Americans.  I think they lack historic depth.  We have always had very bad people abusing fellow human beings.  Mr Soleimani is not unique.  And killing such people is not unique.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




SS-Gruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich was attacked on 27 May 1942, outside of Prague (Operation ANTHROPOID), by Czech Partisans, supported by the British Government.

This information is from the Heydrich Wikipedia page.

Heydrich wore many hats in the Third Reich, including President of the International Criminal Police Commission (later known as Interpol).  He was the founding head of the Sicherheitsdienst (Security Service, SD), an internal intelligence organization.  He helped organize Kristallnacht, a series of coordinated attacks against Jews throughout Nazi Germany and parts of Austria on 9–10 November 1938.  Upon his arrival in Prague, Heydrich sought to eliminate opposition to the Nazi occupation by suppressing Czech culture and deporting and executing members of the Czech resistance.  He was directly responsible for the Einsatzgruppen, the special task forces that travelled in the wake of the German armies and murdered more than two million people by mass shooting and gassing, including 1.3 million Jews.  On 20 January 1942, Heydrich chaired a meeting, now called the Wannsee Conference, which formalized plans for the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question"—the deportation and genocide of all Jews in German-occupied Europe.

Here is Wikipedia on the assault on Heydrich:

In London, the Czechoslovak government-in-exile resolved to kill Heydrich.  Jan Kubiš and Jozef Gabčík headed the team chosen for the operation, trained by the British Special Operations Executive (SOE).  They returned to the Protectorate, parachuting from a Handley Page Halifax on 28 December 1941, where they lived in hiding, preparing for the mission.

On 27 May 1942, Heydrich planned to meet Hitler in Berlin. German documents suggest that Hitler intended to transfer him to German-occupied France where the French resistance was gaining ground.  Heydrich would have to pass a section where the Dresden-Prague road merges with a road to the Troja Bridge.  The junction in the Prague suburb of Libeň was well suited for the attack because motorists have to slow for a hairpin bend.  As Heydrich's car slowed, Gabčík took aim with a Sten submachine gun, but it jammed and failed to fire.  Heydrich ordered his driver Klein to halt and attempted to confront the attackers, rather than having his driver speed away.  Kubiš then threw a converted anti-tank mine at the rear of the car as it stopped.  The explosion wounded both Heydrich and Kubiš. Heydrich ordered Klein to chase Gabčík on foot, and Gabčík shot Klein in the leg.  Kubiš and Gabčík managed to escape the scene.

A Czech woman went to Heydrich's aid and flagged down a delivery van.  He was placed on his stomach in the back of the van and taken to the emergency room at Bulovka Hospital.  He had suffered severe injuries to his left side, with major damage to his diaphragm, spleen, and one lung.  A splenectomy was performed, and the chest wound, left lung, and diaphragm were all debrided.  Himmler ordered Karl Gebhardt to fly to Prague to assume care.  Despite a fever, Heydrich's recovery appeared to progress well.  Hitler's personal doctor Theodor Morell suggested the use of the new antibacterial drug sulfonamide, but Gebhardt thought that Heydrich would recover and declined the suggestion.  Heydrich reconciled himself to his fate on 2 June, during a visit by Himmler, by reciting one of his father's operas:

The world is just a barrel-organ which the Lord God turns Himself.  We all have to dance to the tune which is already on the drum.
Heydrich slipped into a coma after Himmler's visit and never regained consciousness.  He died on 4 June; an autopsy concluded that he died of sepsis.

Funeral

After an elaborate funeral held in Prague on 7 June 1942, Heydrich's coffin was placed on a train to Berlin, where a second ceremony was held in the new Reich Chancellery on 9 June.  Himmler gave the eulogy.  Hitler attended and placed Heydrich's decorations—including the highest grade of the German Order, the Blood Order Medal, the Wound Badge in Gold, and the War Merit Cross 1st Class with Swords—on his funeral pillow.  Although Heydrich's death was employed for pro-Reich propaganda, Hitler privately blamed Heydrich for his own death, through carelessness:

Since it is opportunity which makes not only the thief but also the assassin, such heroic gestures as driving in an open, unarmoured vehicle or walking about the streets unguarded are just damned stupidity, which serves the Fatherland not one whit.  That a man as irreplaceable as Heydrich should expose himself to unnecessary danger, I can only condemn as stupid and idiotic
Seems that they were both horrible people, from a civilization point of view.  Both seem to have felt that all is fair in war.  Both seem to feel that there was no action to base.

The difference is that Heydrich was internal until war broke out and then he operated in occupied territory.  In contrast, Qassim Soleimani operated a great guerrilla group across the Middle East, operating in the territory of other nations, including Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.  He seemed to feel free to poke at a number of additional nations, including Israel and Saudi Arabia.  He supported the idea of "Death to America" (and Israel).  And meant it.

It is always sad when a human dies.  However, this was a person who engaged in this killing, in a big way.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Misunderstanding the British Election


For John, BLUF:  I know there are people who think we would be better off with a government more like Venezuela, but frankly those folks have a solution for making all equal (except for the leaders) by making everyone poor.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Corbyn is no Sanders, Johnson is no Trump

From Commonweal Magazine, by Associate Editor Matthew Sitman, 24 December 2019.

Here is the lede plus one:

In the weeks leading up to the Conservative Party’s triumph in the British elections earlier this month, there were just enough glimmers of hope to let Labour partisans nurture what, deep down, they probably knew were unrealistic dreams of an upset—anecdotes about surging voter registration, talk of armies of canvassers, a bit of movement in the polls.  In the end, that only made the final results more stunning.  Boris Johnson will lead a commanding majority in Parliament with a mandate, as his campaign slogan went, to “get Brexit done.”

The vote tallies had barely been announced when pundits began churning out dire warnings about what this meant for Democrats in the United States: See what happens when you move too far left?  In the Atlantic, Yascha Mounk gravely suggested that if Democrats “position themselves outside of America’s cultural mainstream, they may suffer the same dismal fate as Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party.”  In New York magazine, Andrew Sullivan admonished them to “ignore the woke.”  The New York Times rushed out an article about the “ominous signs” centrist politicians like Joe Biden and Rahm Emanual saw in Labour’s defeat.  Roger Cohen, also in the New York Times, published a column titled “Boris Johnson and the Coming Trump Victory in 2020.”  His colleague Bret Stephens seemed to agree, concluding that to oppose Trump with “progressive primal screams is to ensure his re-election.”

Not much of this was serious analysis. It’s true that Donald Trump could win again in November, especially in the absence of an economic downturn.  But the direct comparisons between U.S. politics and what happened in Great Britain strain credulity.  Most of all, Jeremy Corbyn was a deeply unpopular candidate, quite apart from his politics.  His approval rating going into the election was forty points underwater.  While some of this surely was due to an onslaught of negative press, including charges of anti-Semitism, it’s also true that Corbyn could seem evasive in his answers about Brexit, allowing his position to be tagged as “dither and delay”—during his final debate with Johnson, he refused to say whether he would campaign for or against the deal he promised he would negotiate with Brussels and put to a second referendum.  Bernie Sanders, often compared to Corbyn, is viewed quite differently.  As Eric Levitz pointed out, he’s “more than 15 times as popular as his British comrade.”

There’s little evidence that Labour’s leftwing agenda should be blamed for their loss. One exit poll found that only 12 percent of respondents cited the party’s economic policies as the reason they didn’t vote for Labour, while 43 percent said it was because of the party’s leadership.  Polling on the Labour platform was summarized this way by the Independent:  “The public are absolutely not scared of government intervention and quite like Labour's socialist platform.  These policies individually range from quite popular to ridiculously popular.”  Proposals to raise taxes on the rich and nationalize railways and water companies, for example, garnered broad support. Whatever else this means, it certainly doesn’t prove that Democrats should tack to the center instead of embracing a wealth tax, Medicare for All, or the Green New Deal.

When Trump runs for re-election, he’ll no longer be a blank screen onto which voters can project their hopes, but a candidate who has to defend a record of astonishing cruelty, incompetence, and pathetic obedience to the demands of corporations and plutocrats.

There is at least one lesson Democrats should take away from the British elections, however: rightwing populism remains a potent political force.

Why is populism "Right Wing"?.nbsp; Using left and right to describe parties is not very accurate.  For example, the Nazis, socialists of a different rank as described as "right wing".  Are they?  If murder is the criteria, they are more like Communists.

It is like using "red" and "Blue" to describe US political parties.  In the course of my life Red has almost always been the part of Revolution.  Are the Republicans, the GOP, the revolutionaries?

But most of all, the working class in the United States is rapidly becoming more diverse—in a decade or two, half of it will be people of color.  Much of the commentary on the British elections has simply erased this fact, treating the aging white population of a small island as representative of our own electorate.  Lacking a controversy as galvanizing as Brexit, and faced with the prospect of the United States becoming a majority-minority country within many of our lifetimes, the GOP increasingly relies on undemocratic institutions such as the Electoral College, the Senate, and the courts, as well as assaults on voting rights and foreign interference in elections, to cling to power.  If Trump wins again, it will not look like the wave that delivered Johnson his impressive majority.  It’s more likely that he’ll win while receiving millions fewer votes than his Democratic opponent—an prospect that reveals a different task for those who want to see him defeated.
I was wondering if Mr Sitman was a racist, since he seems to be viewing politics through the lens of race and ethnicity.  Then I cheated and looked up the word.  The word suggests that one views one's own race as inherently superior to other races.  That doesn't seem to be Mr Sitman.  He seems to view politics in terms of the balance of races, rather than through the lens of The Declaration of Independence.  Where Mr Sitman and I differ is that he seems to think that all left wing views and political systems are equal and I believe we have a very good system and we should be looking for immigrants who wish to benefit from it and sustain it.  To be blunt, I want some semblance of an Anglo-Saxon form of Government, something that caters to what we call The Rights of Englishmen.

The other way Mr Sitman goes wrong is in understanding today's political situation.  As Reporter Silena Zito keeps pointing out, it wasn't that Mr Treump (or Mr Boris Johnson) created a political moment.  Rather, they stumbled upon it and exploited the moment.  Here is a column that talks to the, "The Town That Wouldn't Be Passed By".  We are still a fairly high trust society.  I don't wish to see the US become more like Latin American societies, especially Mexico, with not only a drug cartel society, but an avocado cartel society.♠

As for the sub headline, I think Mr Jeremy Corbyn is a disaster and an anti-semite.  As for Senator Sanders, some of his associates are anti-semites and his proposals are a disaster for the American economy and the American People.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  A couple of weeks ago an avocado cartel shot up some town in Mexico, asserting their authority.  What can you do?  Boycott guacamole and vote Republican in November 2020.

Monday, October 7, 2019

Alternate View


For John, BLUF:  It is always valuable to go back and review one's assumptions.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

A new book examines the cherry-picking involved in the modern castigation of imperialist countries.

From The American Conservative, by Mr Casey Chalk, 15 August 2019.

Here is the lede plus two:

Several years ago, while on a business trip to New Delhi, I remarked to an Indian colleague, a Hindu, on the beauty of his country’s Sansad Bhavan, or Parliament House.  “Yes,” he remarked, “though we Indians didn’t design it.  It was the British.  And Taj Mahal was built by the Muslim Turkic Mughals.  None of the best architecture in this country is truly Indian.”

I was a bit shocked by his frank willingness to appreciate his country’s debt to former conquerors.  Later, after I noticed a worn copy of P.G. Wodehouse on his office desk, he acknowledged that he and his Indian colleagues all loved British literature above any other.  Perhaps, I surmised, imperialism’s legacy is not as black and white as we are often told.

This is the central argument of University of Exeter professor of history Jeremy Black’s new book Imperial Legacies:  The British Empire Around the World, which, according to the book jacket, is a “wide-ranging and vigorous assault on political correctness, its language, misuse of the past, and grasping of both present and future.”  The imperial legacy of Great Britain is also, in a way, an instructional lesson for the United States, which, much like the British Empire of the early to mid-20th century, is experiencing a slow decline in influence.

I am not saying colonialism was a good thing, but those who extracted the better parts from it have benefitted.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, October 5, 2019

It Doesn't End With Guns


For John, BLUF:  In the effort to stop murder and mayhem by elimination of the tools there is a never ending chain of items to be banned.  It will not end with the AR-15 and the AK-47.  Then it will be all guns, and then knives and then….  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Samizdata, by Ms Natalie Solent (Essex), 26 September 2019.

Here is the lede plus six:

Church leaders urge government to ban pointed kitchen knives.

Church leaders in the Diocese of Rochester have called for the government to enforce stricter rules on the sale of domestic knives.

They’ve written an open letter asking for a ban on the sale of pointed kitchen knives.  The letter was also signed by leading crime experts, as well as MPs, and community leaders.

“Historically we needed a point on the end of our knife to pick up food because forks weren’t invented.  Now we only need the point to open packets when we can’t be bothered to find the scissors,” the letter reads.

It continues:  “A five-year study in Edinburgh found that of the sharp instruments used in homicides, 94 per cent were kitchen knives.  Research demonstrates kitchen knives are used in a large percentage of homicides due to their availability and lethal nature.

“Criminologists have demonstrated that reducing availability in turn reduces crime.

“The UK has worked for the public good by restricting handguns, paracetamol, smoking in public and plastic bags – now it is time to say ‘no bloody point’.”

.

Regards  —  Cliff

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Delaying the Inevitable?


For John, BLUF:  The British voted to leave the European Union and the British Elites can't stand it.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

MPs prepare for legal battle in case PM attempts to defy law forcing him to ask for extension

From The Manchester Guardian, by Mr Michael Savage—no, not that Michael Savage—7 September 2019.

Here is the lede plus one:

Senior MPs opposing a no-deal Brexit sought assurances from the EU that their bid for a three-month delay would be granted, it has emerged.

European leaders were sounded out before MPs, including the “rebel alliance”, passed a bill, which is expected to receive royal assent on Monday, forcing Boris Johnson to ask for an extension.  However, those involved said there were no guarantees in a process that was changing by the day.

It comes as the rebels, including former Tories who have been thrown out of the party, prepare for a legal battle in case the prime minister attempts to defy a law forcing him to ask for an extension on 19 October.  The UK is due to leave the EU on 31 October, but the new law would envisage a Brexit extension until the end of January 2020.

Opposition parties have agreed to block a general election before a Brexit extension has been agreed.

I especially like the fourth paragraph, where the British Elites, the Remainers, pledge themselves to NOT seeking the will of the people through a national election.  Think of Climate Change and how the Elites of the Democratic Party want you to stop eating cheese burgers and using plastic straws, not through persuasion, but by force.  It’s for your own good.

As Writer Bertolt Brecht wrote of the East German uprising of 1953:

After the uprising of the 17th of June
The Secretary of the Writers Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only By redoubled efforts.

Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?

It will be interesting to see how BoJo deals with this problem.  He can't dissolve Parliament, but he can send them home, so they do no more mischief.

It does seem a tad disloyal for Members of Parliament to be negotiating with the EU Elites in Brussels in their fight with the Prime Minister.  And careless to let their disloyal actions leak.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Thursday, August 15, 2019

Thomas More, Saint


For John, BLUF:  True heroes are hard to find.  Nothing to see here; just move along.



As Law Professor Gail Hariot points out today, at InstaPundet, today would have been Writer Robert Bolt's 95th Birthday.  She links tothis post at The Volokh Conspiracy, "Today Is the 95th Anniversary of Playwright Robert Bolt's Birth", which she also authored.

Thus this article at the Wanderer, "St. Thomas More Didn’t Die For This — Did He?”, seemed appropriate. 

More exemplified two very distinct Catholic virtues, ones that Americans instinctively embrace and totalitarians of any stripe — Elizabethan, socialist, or fascist, for example — instinctively reject.

First and foremost is the role of conscience in public life.  Not the sort of gnostic conscience that embraces some abstract personal truth, nor the slavish devotion to rules.  Rather, conscience properly formed that understands the subjective and objective qualities of its purpose are directed toward one end — to conform to the just and to the good.

Second and perhaps less discussed is the surrender of Christian pluralism to totalitarianism, something Bolt clearly communicates in A Man for All Seasons but is somewhat lost today.  Critics of More will claim that he extended very little religious freedom to those who fought against the Catholic Church while ignoring the bloodthirsty nature of both Cromwell and the Elizabethan pogroms that followed the death of Queen Mary.  Yet More’s defense regarding his silence is what touches the Catholic heart.  We quote Bolt’s play in full:

“I am the King’s true subject, and I pray for him and all the realm.  I do none harm.  I say none harm.  I think none harm.  And if this be not enough to keep a man alive, then in good faith I long not to live.”
Considering the events of the present day, and it is becoming increasingly clear to many faithful Catholics that our silence — our willingness to live good lives, to do none harm, say none harm, and think none harm — will not be enough.
Saint Thomas more lived 500 years ago, but left us a model of how to live, and die.  His parting words were:
I die the King's good servant, and God's first.
Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, June 3, 2019

Corbyn Is Ignorant


For John, BLUF:  British Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbynization is either too young to remember or he is an ignorant toad.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

  • Pro-Palestine activists have been conducting a 'campaign of intimidation' against Jewish shops that sell products from Israel for years
  • The Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which is supported by Corbyn, has forced two Jewish businesses to close and activists have threatened others
  • Other groups targeted a British Jewish shopkeeper in Ireland and Scotland, forcing him to relocate three times and eventually flee Britain
  • A new film, Hounded, has been released by anti-racist campaigners to draw attention to how British Jewish shopkeepers have been living in fear for years

From The Daily Mail, by Associate Global Editor Jake Wallis Simons, 31 May 2019.

Here is the lede plus three:

British Jews have spoken of their fear after a pro-Palestine group supported by Jeremy Corbyn forced Jewish-owned shops to close by staging aggressive rallies outside them.

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), of which Mr Corbyn is patron, targeted shops selling Israeli products in Brighton, London and Manchester, forcing two businesses to fold.

Earlier this month, it organised a rally in London which saw ‘open anti-Semitism from attendees’, according to the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism. A statement from the Labour leader was read out to the crowd.

It comes as Labour became the only party after the BNP to be formally investigated for racism by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

And our own Democratic Party seems to be following Jeremy Corbyn's lead.  Sad.  Very sad.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, January 26, 2019

Don't Mess With Melania


For John, BLUF:  Good on Mrs Trump.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Bloomberg, by Ms Kelly Gilblom, 26 January 2019.

I got there via Hot Air, which had this excerpt:

In an explanation titled “Melania Trump — An Apology,” the newspaper wrote that the first lady’s father was not “a fearsome presence and did not control the family.”  It also said she didn’t leave her studies in design and architecture at university due to an exam, but because she wanted to pursue a career as a model.  It also said it inaccurately stated she was “struggling” as a model when she met Donald Trump, now the president.

It corrected the timing of when she met Trump, and when her family arrived in the U.S.  The apology also said the story erroneously reported she cried the night her husband was elected president.

It should be noted that libel law in the United Kingdom is a little tighter on Press than it is in the US.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff