War as Part of History

For John, BLUF:  Some things are worth fighting about, and some aren't.  Nothing to see here; just move along.

---

Here is some bad news out of The Washington Post late last night.  Professor Ian Morris gave us "In the long run, wars make us safer and richer".  Here is the lede:

Norman Angell, the Paris editor of Britain’s Daily Mail, was a man who expected to be listened to.  Yet even he was astonished by the success of his book “The Great Illusion,” in which he announced that war had put itself out of business.  “The day for progress by force has passed,” he explained.  From now on, “it will be progress by ideas or not at all.”

He wrote these words in 1910. One politician after another lined up to praise the book.  Four years later, the same men started World War I.  By 1918, they had killed 15 million people; by 1945, the death toll from two world wars had passed 100 million and a nuclear arms race had begun.  In 1983, U.S. war games suggested that an all-out battle with the Soviet Union would kill a billion people — at the time, one human in five — in the first few weeks.  And today, a century after the beginning of the Great War, civil war is raging in Syria, tanks are massing on Ukraine’s borders and a fight against terrorism seems to have no end.

The best line of the article is:  "So yes, war is hell — but have you considered the alternatives?"

I think it was Neal Crossland who wrote, just a week or so ago, that war is civilization's reset button.  Let us hope we don't need it anytime soon.

Regards  —  Cliff

♠  Ian Morris, a professor of classics at Stanford University, is the author of “War! What is it Good For? Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots.”