For John, BLUF: There are truly weird ideas out there, foisted on us in the name of "social justice". Nothing to see here; just move along.
The linked item is a comment on a 6 June 2018 editorial in Nature, headlined "Science benefits from diversity". Here is the sub-headline:
Improving the participation of under-represented groups is not just fairer — it could produce better research.
The discussion is from L'Ombre de l'Olivier, by Francis Turner, 14 June 2018.
The blog discussion ends with this quote from Quora:
I got into an argument with my friend because I reject evolution because it’s heteronormative. Are science going to make evolution more inclusive or will they replace it with something else?Yes, we should absolutely have diversity in science. Everyone should have a crack at playing in that sandbox, since, after aviation, it is the most fun sandbox around.
As for the idea that there is caucasian male heteronormative science and then there are alternative scientific answers and caucasian male heteronormative science is oppressive, I would like to see the peer reviewed studies. Back in the day there was the expression "light in the loafers" for those whose sexual orientation was gay, but that did not literally mean that there was a separate law of gravity for non-straight men. That approach to science is like a self-licking ice cream cone and does nothing to unlock the secrets nature still holds.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff