For John, BLUF: Maybe Mr Peter Strzok has a case, but I think he is more likely to be caught up in exposure of criminal activity within the FBI, or at least an unethical streak amongst certain high level members of the FBI. Nothing to see here; just move along.
I SAY HE NEEDS HANGING, CUT DOWN WHILE STILL LIVING, AND HIS ENTRAILS BURNED BEFORE HIS EYES. IF THAT’S CRUEL AND UNUSUAL, IT JUST BETRAYS TIMIDITY OF THE PUBLIC TO ENDURE THIS NONSENSE WITH NO RETALIATION
From The InstaPundit, by Author Sarah Hoyt, 7 August 2019.
Here is the lede plus one:
Peter Strzok Sues FBI, Cites Privacy And Freedom Of Speech Were ViolatedI get that he betrayed our nation, and his wife, in public, but Ms Hoyt seems to have reverted to a harsher time, but then she is originally from Europe. However, the court slapping him down might be good for the FBI and the nation. And, he apparently was found to be less than candid in his discussions with DOJ Investigators.
Look, he betrayed the will of his sovereign, we the people, and plotted against us, and our lawfully constituted Republic. And then he wants redress from our courts… I might be a little angry.
And he was pretty disrespectful of Walmart shoppers.
On the other hand, I would not like to see him and his family homeless, and a charge on the public's treasury.
On the other other hand, if he were to win his job back, and I was at the Resolute Desk, I would have him detailed to the White House and put him in an office with no phone or Internet, as a protection for the American People.
Hat tip to the InstaPundit.
Regards — Cliff