The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.
Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 12, 2023

Musk Restores Balance


For John, BLUFIt appears Mr Elon Musk has restored balanve to X, but that is seen by some as inbalance.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Althouse, by Professor Ann Althouse, 12 September 2023.

Here is the lede plus rhree:

"Since late July, engagement on X posts linking to the New York Times has dropped dramatically.  The drop in shares and other engagement on tweets with Times links is abrupt, and is not reflected in links to similar news organizations including CNN, the Washington Post, and the BBC...."

From "Twitter appears to throttle New York Times" (Semafor).

We're told this might have something to do with "a broad shift in platforms over the last five years... toward a splintering in which Facebook has largely gotten out of the news business, Twitter has shifted increasingly toward becoming a conservative media company, and Google and Apple are the remaining the platform giants interested in distributing other outlets’ news."

That's so sloppily written I feel insulted putting my time into trying to understand it.  There's been a "shift" in which "Twitter has shifted."  The double "shift" tells you no one serious is proofreading over there.  And what's the "splintering"?  It sounds exciting, but the sentence just goes on to make vague, questionable assertions.  My impression was that Twitter (AKA X) has stopped censoring conservative speech.  If you think it now looks like "a conservative media company," perhaps you're observing how important censorship has been to the dominance of liberal speech in social media.

Professor Althouse writes:  "If you think it now looks like "a conservative media company," perhaps you're observing how important censorship has been to the dominance of liberal speech in social media."  Yes, there has been a sense from some quarters that there was a thumb on the scale.  And Federal Courts are recognizing that.

Mr Stewart Brand coined the phrase Information wants to be free.  I take it to mean that information wants an even playing field, so people can determine the truth, for themslves.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Canada Fears Mass Migration from South of the Border


For John, BLUFKeep in mind that this is a humor piece.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Sense of Events Blog, by Writer Donald Sensing, 25 April 2022.

Here is the lede plus two:

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced this morning that he will work closely with the Canadian parliament to rush building a wall along the country's border with the United States to halt the mass immigration to Canada of American leftists, journalists, and celebrities fleeing after today's sale of Twitter to Elon Musk.

The prime minister, noting that Canada's immigration web site had crashed in 2016 as American liberals panicked, said that action to stop the Americans' looming, illegal border crossings was urgently needed.

"We cannot accept large numbers of American, left-wing sore losers coming to Canada just because the world's wealthiest man bought their favorite 'free speech for me but not for thee' platform," Prime Minister Trudeau told a chapter meeting of retired Royal Canadian Mounted Police.  "Anyone caught crossing into Canada without authority will be deported."

Yes, a sarcastic piece, but I can see parts of it happening.

Mr Elon Musk buying out Twitter is a real thing and has caused many people to say absolutely stupid things.  For example, people saying they are worried about news reports being suppressed.  Heavens to Betsey, even The Old Gray Lady has acknowledged that the Twitter suppressed Hunter Biden Laptop story was in fact real enough.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, February 21, 2022

Slow Break


For John, BLUFI do not do Twitter, and quote it sparingly, but I was interested in Former President Trumps new Social Media Application.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Truth Social

The problem is, this APP requires iPhone IOS 13.  My iPhone IOS is 12.5.5, and will never be upgrading to 13.  Unless the APP developers go back and provide a modified version, I will not be there.

Mr Devin Nunes, please take note.

Regards  —  Cliff

Thursday, February 3, 2022

Following the Science


For John, BLUFThe last two years appears to have seen a certain amount of fraud on the part of Federal Medical Sciencists, aided and abetted by the media, including social media.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Victory Girls Blog, by Ms Nina Bookout, 2 Februry 2022.

Here is the lede plus three:

Lockdowns are a failure. That’s the gist of a new in-depth study from Johns Hopkins. How much of a failure? Covid mortality rates were reduced by a mere .2%
Lockdowns during the first COVID-19 wave in the spring of 2020 only reduced COVID-19 mortality by .2% in the U.S. and Europe, according to a Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of several studies.

“While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted,” the researchers wrote.  “In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

POINT TWO PERCENT! That’s it. That’s all the lockdowns did in regards to keeping us “safe” from Covid. : In other words, the draconian lockdowns have solved nothing and have, as we’ve written about multiple times, caused more problems than it solved!
There is a lot we didn't know about COVID-19 when we became awware of it.  I am sure that some in Government felt that their duty was to provide the People with a firm path forward, leaving no room for doubt for the benighted hoi polloi.

Going back to the root of the current problem, it seems that some from the Federal Health Establishment felt that it was more important to appear certain than to admit the uncertainty that existed.  The mask thing is, for me, an example.  From we don’t need them to we need two shows a self-serving set of bureaucrats, trying to downplay the importance of masks, to protect the supply, to eventually, everyone should be masked.  Self-serving medical-political leaders.  The thread through it all is don’t trust the benighted hoi palloi.  That is no way to run a democracy.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Thursday, August 19, 2021

Social Media and Neutrality


For John, BLUFThose who think the Internet is neutral haven't been paying attention.  It has developed a political point of view.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Epoch Times, by Mr Jack Phillips, 5 July 2021.

Here is the lede plus two:

Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia, warned that the online encyclopedia is “more one-sided than ever” in light of the website’s entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election, former President Donald Trump’s two impeachments, and other contentious topics.

Sanger, in particular, took issue with how some Wikipedia entries are sourced.

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources—and sources friendly to globalist progressivism—are permitted,” he wrote in an article on his website.

And, yet, I use it.  Because it is better than nothing.  But, I apply judgment in its use.

We are in an era where those involved in directing high tech are left leaning.  Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia and so on.  It is time for our legal system to adjust, no longer treating these organizations as neutral.  They are not.  They are partisan.  Think of Twitter putting out the words of the Taliban, but banning a former US President.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, August 16, 2021

Mindless


For John, BLUFI would like to see US Main Stream Media explain the juxtaposition.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




The InstaPundit Blog Post is by Author Ed Driscoll, 16 August 2021, 2:22pm.  The author of the linked article at Out Kick is Mr Joe Kinsey, 16 August 2021.

Here is the lede from the linked article:

We’re currently living in a world where a Taliban spokesperson is allowed to give operational updates in Afghanistan via a Twitter account that is being cited by mainstream news outlets from around the world, while Donald Trump’s account remains suspended.
Is former President Donal Trump really that much of a threat to the American People, or to the would, that he should be suspended, but the Taliban are OK.  I am listening to President Biden talking about the threat of terrorism.  He makes the case that terrorism is a threat.  Yet we quivver at the thought of Donald Trump on Twitter.  Sad.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, July 5, 2021

The Source


For John, BLUFWhy did it all of a sudden become acceptable to question the origin of COVID-19?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Epoch Times, by Reporters Isabel van Brugen and Jan Jekielek, 2 July 2021.

Here is the lede plus one:

The sudden shift in narrative over the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a lab in Wuhan, China, is mysterious and contingent to “just how corrupt our system has become,” according to evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein.

Weinstein, biologist and co-host of the DarkHorse Podcast, has since last year explored the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a laboratory.  He told Epoch TV’s “American Thought Leaders” program (episode premiering on Sat. July 3) that the fact that the hypothesis is now receiving widespread recognition from the international community is “completely mysterious.”

How much of this is really about the media, including the technocrat managers of socoal media, trying to curate the story?.

Knowing, if we can, does not mean that justice will be done.  But, it will allow for a democratic process to sort through the the proper actions, within the law.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, April 16, 2021

Censorship in America


For John, BLUFSocial Media is becoming an American version of China's Social Credit system, with censorship of unwoke ideas being used liberally.  Perhaps the most celebrated was Mr Hunter Biden's misplaced laptop, just before last November's Election.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Epoch Times, by Reporter Masooma Haq, 15 April 2021.

Here is the lede plus two:

MyPillow’s Mike Lindell announced on April 15 that his new social media platform called “Frank,” with the mission of providing a place for free speech as laid out in the U.S. Constitution, will launch on April 19.

In a video statement, Lindell said he’s taken steps to make sure the site is most secure, with his own servers, and will not be subject to censorship on the whims of big tech companies such as Amazon and Google.

“And we are going to get our voice of free speech out there,” Lindell said. “On Monday morning at 9 a.m., we’re going to have the biggest launch. … I call it a Frank-a-thon.”

With Big Tech censoring news items in ways that appear to be censorship of conservative or liberal ideas and news items, there is a desire out there for alternative outlets for people's ideas.  Government censorship and sanctions seems not to be the solution.  Perhaps the free market is the solution.

Good luck to Mr Mike Lindell.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Competition for Twitter


For John, BLUFUntil this article I had never heard of Clubhouse.  On the other hand, I was happy not knowing about it.  Especially after I dropped Twitter.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Hill, by Reporter Revecca Klar, 21 February 2021, 08:00 AM EST.

Here is the lede plus four:

Clubhouse, an emerging social media platform born during the coronavirus-driven lockdowns, has given users a chance to connect through intimate audio conversations with virtual strangers even while isolated at home.

But as the platform continues to grow, the same model that has allowed users to connect while physically apart is raising concerns about how the app will handle the spread of misinformation.

Unlike traditional social media platforms, where a user’s footprint is more permanent, Clubhouse’s chat room conversations are not recorded by the app, making it "essentially impossible" to discern the spread of false information or harassment, Emerson Brooking, resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, told The Hill.

“Because your words don't follow you the same way that they do with a Twitter account, you do feel more relaxed, and that means the app is working as intended.  But of course, it means it also poses particular dangers,” Brooking added.

Brooking said Clubhouse’s model allows users to feel inclined to speak freely, without necessarily contemplating whether they’re sharing accurate information — or the consequences of spreading misinformation.

I wonder how he (Emerson Brooking) thinks his grandparents made it without someone blocking out all the disinformation for them.  It must have been very risky.  It is a wonder we ever elected Franklin D Roosevelt, Harry S Truman and Dwight D Eisenhower.

The only solution to this disinformation problem is:

ABOLISH ALL BACK YARD FENCES LOWER THAN TWELVE FEET!
We can’t have neighbors talking to each other!  They might be spreading false information!

If we believe that people are smart enough to vote for their leaders then we need to give them credit for being able to sort out the false from the true, which is what voting is all about.  That said, voting in the US accepts that some large percentage of voters, on the losing side, will be wrong.  Wrong, wrong, wrong!  They will not have sorted as well as the winning side.  But, it has worked for a couple of hundred years.

We need to be careful regarding messing with the flow of information, especially actions based on the idea that the voters are stupid.  The urge to curate information will lead to other actions that thwart free choice in our democracy, which means no democracy.

But, I am not a University Poly Sci Professor, although I did substitute for one for a week, until the union figured it out and sent in a professional professor to mess with the minds of the students.  :-)

Regards  —  Cliff

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Who Are You Going to Believe?


For John, BLUFSomeone writing in The Times (the real one, in London, not the Old Gray Lady in New York City) asks about Americans believing conspiracy theories, which leads to asking about their media.  Good questions.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Samizdata, by Ms Natalie Solent (Essex), 13 January 2021.

Here is the lede plus many:

“Why does the US fall for conspiracy theories?” asks Daniel Finkelstein in the Times.
QAnon, the online conspiracy theory to which many Trump supporters subscribe, is like fan fiction, with endless riffs on Trump and increasingly bizarre plots about the skulduggery of his enemies.  The contributors to this script have the pleasure of being the heroes of it, setting out to cleanse the nation.  Like Matt Damon in The Bourne Identity, they have woken and are gradually peeling away layers of deception.  The deep state behaves as it does in every film but will prove no match for the hero.
The deep state behaves as it does in every film – As an aside, that, the endless stream of conspiracy thrillers put out by Hollywood, will do as Explanation No.1.  The scriptwriters of these movies were unable to conceive of the cabal of senior people in the US government, the CIA, the FBI, and the military as anything other than right wing, but the imagination of the American people is not so limited.

A personal best:  I have digressed even before I began.  The main point of this post is… ah, **** it, I already said it:

By censoring the Hunter Biden story the MSM has destroyed its ability to convince Americans there was no vote fraud.

By censoring the Hunter Biden story the MSM has also hampered its ability to convince Americans there is no “cabal of Satan-worshipping Democrats, Hollywood celebrities and billionaires” which “runs the world while engaging in pedophilia, human trafficking and the harvesting of a supposedly life-extending chemical from the blood of abused children.”

It has also hampered its ability to convince Americans, and not only them, that they should be vaccinated against coronavirus. Hitherto the English-speaking countries plus the Nordics have been somewhat less prone to vaccine conspiracy theories than people in most of Western or Eastern Europe.  I expect that to change, and that change will kill people.  That is what happens when the boy cries wolf too many times.

There is more to the post at the link.

Please note that Blogger Natalie Solemt is a Brit.

i think ths blog post sums up my view.  The press, by supressing the Hunter Biden story, by giving space to Russiagate, by flatly denying that there was an fraud in the 2020 Election, have forfieted the right to be accepted as honest brokers of the truth.  The actions of Social Media just add to the problem.  And Mr Jeff Bezos gets an extra penalty for both owning The Washh Post and owning Amazon, which suppressed Parler.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Twitter Against Internet Shutdowns


For John, BLUFGiven that cluelessness seems resident at Twitter, one wonders how they ever stayed in business.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Not the Bee, by Doc Holliday, 12 January 2021, at 2:34 pm.

Here is the lede plus one:

Twitter really just tweeted this in the middle of the conservative purge:
Twitter Public Policy
@Policy
Ahead of the Ugandan election, we're hearing reports that Internet service providers are being ordered to block social media and messaging apps.

We strongly condemn internet shutdowns – they are hugely harmful, violate basic human rights and the principles of the #OpenInternet.
1:22 PM · Jan 12, 2021
7.3K 26.4K people are Tweeting about this

Words fail me.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Saying No to Deplatforming Andy Ngo


For John, BLUFIf there is no Free Speech then we lose our Republic and become just like all those other Oligarchies.  As an inheriter of all those Anglo-Saxon efforts toward the "Rights of Englishment" I am embarrassed.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Yahoo News, by Reporter Carl Samson, 11 January 2021, at 7:01 PM EST.

Here is the lede:

Sarah Jeong, the New York Times reporter who made headlines in 2018 for antagonizing white people, has branded conservative journalist Andy Ngo "dangerous" and called for his censorship on Twitter.  In a tweet posted on Jan. 9, Jeong cited a thread from Donovan Farley, another journalist who claimed that Ngo repeatedly "willfully deceives his followers into a frenzy that results in death and rape threats" for journalists and "anyone else" supposedly targeted by his "scorn."
This desire for censorship is a bad sign in our democracy.  It smacks of authoritarianism.  Who is to decide what can and cannot be said?  Who is to decide when a riot is a good riot (see 2020) and when it is a bad riot (6 January 20212)?

Mr Jim Lyons, recently reëlected Chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party, said this today:

It is clear that those who stand for freedom of speech will be targeted for deletion no matter how big or how small.  Unless you fall into line with Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi’s rhetoric, be prepared to be ostracized and de-platformed.
I think the press-room gang at The Old Gray Lady think a little too much of themselves.  It is like they think that a Press Pass that identifies them as from the NYT indicates that they are a special breed, set apart from us mere plebs.

De-platform yourself.  Find alternative ways of exchanging information.  Sure, Parler has been squashed, but it may well come back.  And, there is always the old fashioned letter and the telephone text message.  And after COVID-19 subsides, there is always having a face to face conversation at Eienstein's Bagels, where all the best people go.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, January 8, 2021

Suppressing the President


For John, BLUFSocial Media platforms banning the President of the United States, while giving a free pass to dictators around the world, is a case of an abusive industry exercising a little too much muscle.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

YouTube hasn’t deplatformed Trump directly, but they’ve doubled down on their promise to penalize channels that post “false claims,” which is awfully subjective.

From Legal Insurrection, by Ms Kemberlee Kaye, 7 January 2021.

Here is the lede plus:

In response to the breach of the Capitol building, several online platforms have deplatformed Trump.

Facebook began by removing Trump’s video asking protesters to return home with peace and joy in their hearts and has now banned Trump’s accounts from posting at least until the post-inauguration transition is complete.

Zukerberg posted the following Wednesday:

The shocking events of the last 24 hours clearly demonstrate that President Donald Trump intends to use his remaining time in office to undermine the peaceful and lawful transition of power to his elected successor, Joe Biden.

His decision to use his platform to condone rather than condemn the actions of his supporters at the Capitol building has rightly disturbed people in the US and around the world.  We removed these statements yesterday because we judged that their effect — and likely their intent — would be to provoke further violence.

Following the certification of the election results by Congress, the priority for the whole country must now be to ensure that the remaining 13 days and the days after inauguration pass peacefully and in accordance with established democratic norms.

Over the last several years, we have allowed President Trump to use our platform consistent with our own rules, at times removing content or labeling his posts when they violate our policies.  We did this because we believe that the public has a right to the broadest possible access to political speech, even controversial speech.  But the current context is now fundamentally different, involving use of our platform to incite violent insurrection against a democratically elected government.

We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great.  Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete.

And, of course, Twitter has suspended President Trump's account in response to the riot on Capitol Hill.

This "banning" of the President from Social Media seems like a coup.  A key to most successful coups is the seizure of communications facilitiers.  Tht is what is happening here.  The President is being isolated.  His message to supporters to be calm and peaceful is being suppressed by Social Media.  How strange.

In the mean time the tyrants across the globe get a free ride:

China Daily: Study says gender equality promoted among Uygur women, ‘making them no longer baby-making machines.’
I am appalled.  Worse, I am concerned for our Democracy going forward.  I don't see our new Democratic Party leaders healing this riff any time soon.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Sunday, January 3, 2021

Restricted News Sources


For John, BLUFThe historic media is not doing it for a large number of us and may face financial issues in the future.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




This is actually from a two part blog post, from InstaPundit, by Mr Ed Driscoll, the first part about the Media itself and the second part about how already the Media and Democrats have moved past Trump as Hitler to look for the new, even worse, Hitler, in this case Senator Josh Hawley, who is proposing to do what Democratic Party Congresscritters have done against the last three Republican Presidential victors—challenge Electors.

From InstaPundit, by Mr Ed Driscoll, 3 January 2021.

Here is what he extracted from this Washington Examiner article:

After 2020, it will be hard to see corporate media as anything but a public relations arm of the Democratic Party following the former’s attempts to bury not one, not two, but three major allegations leveled against left-wing politicians.

Axios, one of the more aggressive and fairer online news outlets, revealed in December that failed presidential candidate and Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California developed a relationship with a suspected Chinese spy who worked on behalf of the Communist Chinese government as part of a far-reaching espionage operation.

Swalwell, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, has declined to address his past interactions with Christine Fang, including that she managed somehow to place an intern in his office.  He has offered no good reason for why he should remain in his congressional assignment despite the sensitive nature of what is discussed in the committee.  His ability to dodge the issue has been enabled in part by media, which have not bothered to press him on the matter.  In fact, news of the congressman’s entanglement with a Chinese spy has been ignored entirely by the larger, older news outlets.

ABC, CBS, and NBC ignored the story entirely when it broke.  The major broadcast networks continued to ignore it even after Republicans moved to have the congressman removed from the intelligence committee.  NBC has nothing on its website about the Chinese spy scandal.  Neither does CBS or ABCThe New York Times, the Associated Press, and the Los Angeles Times, similarly have avoided reporting on the scandal.  Swalwell, meanwhile, has been allowed to skate on the excuse that the Axios report was a hit job orchestrated by the Trump White House, which doesn’t make any sense.

What a change of pace for the newsrooms that have spent the past four years hunting relentlessly for some connection between the Trump administration and Russian intelligence operations!

Not just the media, but also Social Media.  I am expecting people to be voting with their TV Remote and their computer.  With 74 million Trump voters, and others who didn't bother to vote because they see their vote as so small and the vote count so large, there is a big market out there that the Mainstream Media is not filling.  It is time to get your Parler Account.

And what is it with Facebook shutting down a fund raising page for the Georgia Senatorial Runoff candidates Senators Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.)?  Here is Representative David Nunes' Parler page, which talks to the issue and links to this Epoch Times article.  Think about it.  A newspaper being produced by Falun Gong is a more consistent and reliable news source than The Old Gray Lady or NPR.

We are in trouble, but I am hoping the market place will sort it out.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Friday, November 13, 2020

Old Themes


For John, BLUFThis, of course, refers back to the Election in 2016.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the tweet:
Scott Adams
@ScottAdamsSays

· 6h
Did Biden get the most votes because Putin did such a bad job with Facebook memes this election or because China did an unusually good job interfering this time?

It is a good question.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Concern For Social Media


For John, BLUFCalifornia House of Representative Member Devin Nunes is concerned about Big Tech and its throttling of the Internet, thus stiffling free speech.  Remember when the Internet was going to enhance free speech and political discourse?.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Biden’s digital lackeys threaten to turn out the lights on our republic.

From American Mind, Rep Devin Nunes, 16 October 2020.

Here is the lede plus three:

Socialist regimes typically don’t excel at good government or economic stewardship, but they do tend to be experts at one thing—propaganda. Under regimes like the Soviet Union and countless other socialist monstrosities, citizens may not have been able to buy bread without waiting an entire day in line, but they could easily access a galaxy of reports via virtually any medium—print, TV, radio, billboards, schoolbooks, etc.—informing them of the glories of socialism in general and their own leaders in particular.

Americans do not have to wait in line to buy bread yet, but make no mistake: In America today, the socialist propaganda network is already in place.

The mainstream media has proven that Americans can no longer rely on them for unbiased news. Having always leaned left, reporters abandoned all pretense of objectivity following President Trump’s election, turning their outlets into unabashed organs of the anti-Trump movement and every associated leftwing cause. This was amply demonstrated by the years-long Russia collusion hoax, in which every mainstream outlet scrapped journalistic norms on sourcing, anonymity, fact-checking, and other longstanding practices in order to advance the false narrative that Trump colluded with Russians to hack the 2016 election.

Increasingly, however, Americans are no longer accessing news reports through physical newspapers and magazines but through social media. In theory, social media is a democratizing force—people no longer need to own a media company or write for the New York Times in order to reach a potential audience of millions. But it’s now clear that the tech giants who control the digital infrastructure are not providing a neutral platform for all points of view. Instead, they have weaponized their platforms to help the Democrats.

Yes, this is from a month ago, but it is still relevant.

I think the signal that we are in real trouble will be when blog sites, such as this one, start to be shut down.  Then EMail will be checked and censored.  At that point we will be in serious trouble.  On the other hand, it may never come to that.  The Government, and Big Tech will, individually or collectively, realize that they are killing the Goose that laid the Golden Egg.  That is if they are long term thinkers.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, November 9, 2020

Bad Counting Diminishes Our Reputation as a Nation


For John, BLUFYes, this is almost a week old, but it is still on topic, since several States still haven't achieved settled vote totals.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

Nations far poorer and less technologically advanced have no problem holding quick, efficient elections.  Distrust in U.S. outcomes is dangerous but rational.

From Greenwald at Substack, by Reporter Glenn Greenwald, 4 November 2020.

Here is the lede plus one:

The richest and most powerful country on earth — whether due to ineptitude, choice or some combination of both — has no ability to perform the simple task of counting votes in a minimally efficient or confidence-inspiring manner.  As a result, the credibility of the voting process is severely impaired, and any residual authority the U.S. claims to “spread” democracy to lucky recipients of its benevolence around the world is close to obliterated.

At 7:30 a.m. ET on Wednesday, the day after the 2020 presidential elections, the results of the presidential race, as well as control of the Senate, are very much in doubt and in chaos.  Watched by rest of the world — deeply affected by who rules the still-imperialist superpower — the U.S. struggles and stumbles and staggers to engage in a simple task mastered by countless other less powerful and poorer countries: counting votes.  Some states are not expected to finished their vote-counting until the end of this week or beyond.

The same data and polling geniuses who pronounced that Hillary Clinton had a 90% probability or more of winning the 2016 election, and who spent the last three months proclaiming the 2020 election even more of a sure thing for the Democratic presidential candidate, are currently insisting that Biden, despite being behind in numerous key states, is still the favorite by virtue of uncounted ballots in Democrat-heavy counties in the outcome-determinative states.  [One went to sleep last night with the now-notorious New York Times needle of data guru Nate Cohn assuring the country that, with more than 80% of the vote counted in Georgia, Trump had more than an 80% chance to win that state, only to wake up a few hours later with the needle now predicting the opposite outcome; that all happened just a few hours after Cohn assured everyone how much “smarter” his little needle was this time around].

Further on Mr Greeewnwald wrote:
After the pervasive voting problems in the 2018 midterms, I wrote an article with my Brazilian colleague Victor Pougy describing the extraordinary speed and efficiency with which Brazil — a country not exactly renowned for its speed and efficiency — counts its votes.

Brazil is not a small country. It is the fifth most-populous nation on the planet.  Although its population is somewhat smaller than the U.S.’s (330 million to 210 million), its mandatory voting law, automatic registration, and 16-year-old voting age means the number of ballots to be counted is quite similar (105 million votes in Brazil’s 2018 presidential election compared to 130 million votes in the 2016 U.S. presidential election).  And on the same date of its national elections, it, too, holds gubernatorial and Congressional elections in its twenty-seven states.

And yet Brazil — a much poorer and less technologically advanced country than the U.S., with a much shorter history of democracy — holds seamless, quick vote counts about which very few people harbor doubts.  The elections are held on a Sunday, to ensure as many people as possible do not have work obligations to prevent voting, and polls close at 6:00 p.m.

For the 2018 presidential run-off election that led to Jair Bolsonaro’s victory, 90% of all votes were counted and the results released by 6:00 p.m. on the day of the election: the time the last state closed its polls.  The full vote tally was available within a couple of hours after that.  The same was true of the first-round voting held three weeks earlier — which also included races for governor, Senator and Congress in all the states:  full vote totals were released by computer shortly after the polls closed and few had any doubts about their accuracy and legitimacy.

That is an indictment for sure.  This election is an embarrassment to our nation.  Specific examples of vote counting, like Philadelphia, PA, is especially embarrassing.  Worse, it is a slap in the face from Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez and his apparatchiks.

Then there was the tampering with the information available to the voters by social media.  This says that social media is part of a partisan press and does not deserve exemption from being sued.

We need to get back to honest elections.  Gsining office is not more important than personal integrity.  In addition, throwing the bums out does not justify cheating to achieve that goal.

And, no, I am not advocating a voting age of 16.  I would like to return to 21.  As for Sunday voting, that would be fine with me.  Mail-in voting is fine, but the envelope has to be returned by the day before the election.  No late ballots, no excuses.

Regards  —  Cliff

The Blue Tory Voters


For John, BLUF"Pollsters let President Trump get in their way in understanding the electorate, and so did reporters and political scientists."  They missed the trend toward "Blue Tory" voters.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Washington Examiner, by Reporter Salena Zito, 8 November 2020.

Here is the lede plus two:

PINE TOWNSHIP — Had you spent any space of time in this northern suburb of Pittsburgh listening to voters, finding out what things mattered to them when it came to schools, community growth, economic prosperity, and the emotional impact of COVID-19 lockdowns, you would have at least been skeptical of the media narrative and the polls that claimed suburban voters here are no longer center-right.

Not Republican per se, just center-right.

Most reporters certainly didn’t take the time to do so.  Instead, they relied on the scolding of our cultural curators in sports, media, and Hollywood as an indicator of how these college-educated, affluent voters would vote.  Surely, they thought, these suburbs would cave under the cultural pressure, push left, and their votes would send a blue shock wave across the country.

At least there is a theory of why that dream was just a dream and not a likely reality.  The Reporter, Ms Zito, goes on to say:
Going into Election Day, the polls and the media narrative expected that Republicans were going to be swept out of office down the ballot in a blue wave.  They believed the country had now fully embraced "wokeism" and rejected center-right values and principles.

Pollsters let President Trump get in their way in understanding the electorate, and so did reporters and political scientists.

For a brief moment as a reporter, I struggled with lining up what the data was telling me.  It conflicted with what my reporting was telling me, conflicted with what voters were telling me, and conflicted with what cultural cues were telling me.  So I went back out in search of that blue wave in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Wisconsin.

It turns out that the only place that blue wave existed was on Twitter or in a poll — never once in an experience or an interview.

The big failure was on the part of the Press Fraternity.  Even Fox News failed to understand that it was going to be a close run thing and that in the House of Representatives the flow would actually be the other way.  In sum, no Blue Wave, no mandate.

I think Fox News Channel will be hardest hit.  Also likely to be hit is Facebook.  Probably not a big hit, but a noticable blip in the numbers, as folks like my Canadian like Blue Tories skip to other platforms, such as Portal.  They don't like being censored by "Woke" Progressives or Chinese agents.  They are writing in EMails that they have dropped facebook.

Remember when information wanted to be free?  Even Wikipedia remembers.  Sadly, Messrs Jeff Zuckerburg and Jack Dorsey and their ilk do not.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Tuesday, October 20, 2020

Streisand Effect


For John, BLUFSometimes the knee jerk reaction is not the best in a sticky situation.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Wired, by Ms Emily Zanotti, 19 October 2020.

Here is the lede plus three:

Twitter’s crackdown on a controversial New York Post story that “purported to show new emails from Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, about his business dealings while Joe Biden was the vice president in the Obama administration,” “nearly doubled” the story’s visibility and triggered the so-called “Streisand Effect,” amplifying the Post’s claims, according to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a high-profile media intelligence firm.

“When Twitter banned, and then unbanned, links to a questionably sourced New York Post article about Joe Biden’s son Hunter, its stated intention was to prevent people from spreading harmful false material as America heads into the final stretch of the election campaign,” MIT’s Technology Review reported Monday.  “But thanks to the cycle of misinformation—and claims from conservatives that social-media platforms are deliberately censoring their views—Twitter managed to do the opposite of what it intended.”

In fact, Twitter’s efforts triggered a massive spike in interest in the story.  “According to Zignal Labs, a media intelligence firm, shares of the Post article ‘nearly doubled’ after Twitter started suppressing it,” MIT noted.

The incident was a real-time example of what Zignal Lab’s calls the “Streisand Effect” — a “social phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove or censor information has the unintended consequence of further publicizing that information, often via the Internet,” according to Wikipedia.  The name comes from singer Barbra Streisand’s efforts, in 2003, to suppress a photo of her Malibu, California, residence over security concerns.

That is the good news.  And why we have to fight every attempt to "control" the World Wide Web.

As to the issue of if The New York Post was spreading false information, evidence indicates that this Hunter Biden EMail trove is being verified as true from more than one source.

For those who think they are not getting the full sweep of information when they do on-line searchs, consideration might be given to replacing the "Google" Search Engine with an alterntive, such as "DuckDuckGo" or "Bing" (a Microsoft alterntive).  And, there are others.

It may be interesting to follow the Senate Hearings on Twitter's intervention in the Election Campaign.  Don't expect much from the House of Representatives.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

Cancel "Cancel Culture"


For John, BLUFThis is a month old, but still timely.  The Writer thinks "the phrase cancel culture is too vague — a distraction from a deeper examination of power in society.".  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

A reporter’s last thoughts before putting the phrase to rest.

From The New York Times, by Reporter Jonah Engel Bromwich, 14 August 2020.

Here is the lede plus four:

I made a promise to myself. Having had the privilege of appearing on “The Daily,” and having used that privilege to discuss “cancel culture” over the course of not one, but two episodes, I would not write about the phrase ever again.

Then I got an email from a colleague who kindly asked me if I would write this newsletter.

If you listened to the episodes, you know that I started thinking about the phrase “cancel culture” in 2018. That year, the word “canceled,” which had originally circulated as a joke on Black Twitter, began to be used more widely to describe a dynamic frequently playing out on social media. A person would say or do something that was offensive to others, and those people would call out the offender.

Lisa Nakamura, a professor I talked to then, called it a “cultural boycott” — an agreement not to amplify, signal-boost or give money to the person who’s been canceled. In some cases, as the phenomenon developed, “cancellation” could turn punitive, even causing some offenders to be fired from their jobs.

People tend to see cancellation as either wholly good — there are new consequences for saying or doing racist, bigoted or otherwise untenable things — or wholly bad, in that people can lose their reputations and in some cases their jobs, all because a mob has taken undue offense to a clumsy or out-of-context remark. Personally, I think it’s best viewed not as either positive or negative, but as something else: a new development in the way that power works — a development brought about by social media.

I take the Writer's point.  For someone to be fired because of a tweet storm seems a little unfair.  And the actions suggest a "Zero Defects" approach to life.  Sadly, we are dealing with humans and there are always defects, mistakes.  Defects can be reducted by having people pay more attention to what they are doing.  We should work on that.  But, we need a little humanity and humility.

Pointing out mistakes, errors, slips, is fine.  However, it should not automatically trip the guillotine.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff