This is the lede:
Unrest is simmering in some quarters of the Washington news universe regarding changes in the way the Department of Labor (DOL) manages its pre-release media “lockups” on sensitive data like weekly jobless benefits and unemployment.Plus some. I note in passing that each paragraph in the block quote is one sentence long. Does that seem strange to anyone else?
For years, journalists participating in the lockups have shown up at DOL at the appointed time, then entered a limited-access area to receive the new data and prepare news stories for release as soon as official embargoes end.
The system insures that major news organizations get the data as soon as possible and allows journalists covering the release get a jump on providing analyses and opinion about the data.
But Carl Fillichio, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis’ top communications advisor, circulated a memo earlier this week to interested media informing them that everybody is being required to re-submit their credentials requests.
I liked this para in the story in The Washington Examiner:
The BLS has a spotless record of maintaining data integrity and insulation from political pressures to manipulate data content or release timing. Solis and Fillichio are said to be quietly resisting efforts in Congress to shift control of the lockups to BLS.Yes, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is a professional organization.
Regards — Cliff
1 comment:
"BLS is a professional organization" as opposed to BoL which is profoundly NOT professional, rather, just one more gathering of political appointees charged with implementing regime mandates and myths (like...the jobs picture is getting better.....)
Right out of Alinsky....tell a lie enough times and it becomes the truth.
Post a Comment