Given that the drone was a US asset, this eventually tracks back to us.
My question is if the lawyers have located equivelent Taliban offices, where inquiries can be made as to the legitimacy of targets for acid throwing, IEDs and suicide bombers. Are all the targets legitimate under international law?
In the mean time, yes, UK and US Government authorities need to be held to the highest standards in ordering DrOne attacks.
Yes, let the lawyers proceed, but first let a rapacious press go after those lawyers regarding the flip side of this question. Then, when
Regads — Cliff