I have my own reasons for favoring Senator Scott Brown over Law Professor Elizabeth Warren in the Massachusetts Senate race. But, here is George Mason University Law Professor Michael S. Greve, who thinks a good reason to be against Ms Warren is because she is a nag. Not in a small, family, sort of way, but in a big, Federal, bureaucratic way.
What he [Scott Brown] hasn’t said and probably won’t say: she is a nag. A scold. An ideologue. An advocate of a nanny state beyond a Swedish socialist’s wildest imagination. A bureaucratic Bruegel who paints an America of victims—pathetic figures in a landscape of unremitting hostility. Also, Professor Warren is an economic idiot.That last was a bit harsh.
He does provide examples.
Regards — Cliff
3 comments:
I gotta figure Mr.Greve considers abused wives, as women that can't keep their big, fat, pie hole shut.
His world is devoid of victims, afterall.
Right, he disagrees with Warren therefore he must be a misogynist. A variant of the "disagreeing with Obama equals racism."
It's actually a "variant" of Mr. Greve's own logic.
Subtle, I know. I'll type louder, next time.
Post a Comment